Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/2 vs The State Of Assam on 24 March, 2021

Author: Rumi Kumari Phukan

Bench: Rumi Kumari Phukan

                                                                     Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010036032021




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                Case No. : Bail Appln./505/2021

            MD. JAHER ALI AHMED AND 2 ORS
            S/O MD. SIRAJUL HAQUE, R/O VILL-BORUAPATHAR, P.S.-BOKO, DIST-
            KAMRUP, ASSAM

            2: MD. HAFIJUL HAQUE BEPARI
             S/O MD. AMIL HAQUE BEPARI
             R/O VILL-BHERBERI
             BHAGYAPUR
             P.S.-MATIA
             DIST-GOALPARA
            ASSAM

            3: MD. RASIDUL HAQUE
             S/O LT. JABED ALI
             R/O VILL-BORUAPATHAR
             P.S.-BOKO
             DIST-KAMRUP
            ASSA

            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM
            REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM



Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. P K MUNIR

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
                                                                                                Page No.# 2/2

                                                   BEFORE
                        HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
                                         ORDER

24.03.2021 By this application under Section 439 CrPC, petitioners, namely, 1) Md Jaher Ali Ahmed, 2) Md Hafijul Haque Bepari and 3) Md Rasidul Haque, who were arrested on 02.02.2021, has prayed for granting him regular bail, in connection with Palashbari PS Case No. 69/2021, registered under Sections 379/411 of the IPC.

Heard the learned counsel for both the sides.

Also perused the record and the Case Diary.

Case Diary suggests sufficient complicity of the present petitioners and from their house, 6 (six) nos. of stolen motor cycle was recovered along with certain other articles like, HP laptop, mobile handset, fake press ID of reporter, fake number-plates etc and they were found to have involved in fabricating false documents pertaining to such stolen vehicles. The petitioners are found to be habitual offenders and involved in these types of cases, since earlier.

Considering the nature of accusations and materials in the Case Diary, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case to grant the bail prayer to the petitioners at this stage.

Bail Application stands rejected.

Return the Case Diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant