Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

K C Shivanna vs The Manager New India Assurance Co Ltd on 20 July, 2010

éazm

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BAN'{'}A:¥;{3§§E

BETWEEN;

K.C.SHIVANNA, .
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, {

am-'ans THE Lox ADALAT  ,   .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Hi' BAfi§.}Ai;ij'}-R53 _
DATEB THIS THE 20%: mar qr JL?L*£'g"3E~.i§'2§ZS"~::  _ 1 "
CONCiLIA'1'GRS   [ %  
HOWBLE mz..ms'r1cE A.s.r>.ac1i:iA1ét3:::E =  

as'  ~ V %
Sm. 1\€[.U.P0ti)ri°AtZ'§§i1?V£;%.1UiEIs§I3sfi§:?RT 

Hiécenaneous 17[§6G8

szomrre CHIKKAYYA, _.    ,. ,. _
R/AT Nam (103), 11?" 1:Ros'::_, . 
7;"? MAIN, WEST 0? CHORD"Rf3€\D, , 

2"' STAGE, NAGAPURVAA _ x 'if'
BANGALORE - 10.: * 

AEQ
1.

fiPPELi.ANT

 , ( av figs'; ti£T, ADVOCATES )'

THE MAI%w3ER,    
_NEW 1:ss::>1A ASSURANCE CD.LTD.,

" ':'~!D.4C~,./._L}AK$HMi. COMPLEX;""

  K.R.RQm'J, FQRT, "BANGALORE - 02.

L M<3;.+_z§NR,t%j't:, .M?\JC!.'R.;
S[€3;l_Ai<SHM}'?-QSRASIMHA,

  NO.1C$, 3(3). amass, 53"" PAGE,

  R3§3AJINAGAR;_ BANGALORE --- 3.0.

' u i;x?$;frE

.1?" STAGE, WESTOF CHORD RGAD,
 RESPGfiifiE¥*£'§'E"s

V. A' '  (év sax. £).S..SRIDHAR, Auvmmrrs I-"(ii-'K £71»-1)

 'MFA. }='1:Lét:> u/s 173(1) QF MV ACT AGAINST we JUDGMENT AND nwAR;j;:>
D:'17---e;3~20es PASSED IN Mvc NCL2522/209? ow THE FILE :1)? THE 7%

ADDITTEJN-»'sL 3UDGE & MEMBER, MACT, BANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAEM

V ZLVPETIQN FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

 ' THIS APPEAL CGMING ON FOR CGNCILIAITION BEFDRE LCJK ADAURT AFTER
G REFERRED VIBE ORDER E)TD.22-O4-2010, THE FOLLOWING ORDER IS

PASSED.



2
COITCfi.IA'._E};f)ii GREEK
The learned ecmnse}. for the appeii-ant and the £ea:'ne_:i emmeei
for respondent ---Ixzteuraizce Company along with its repregeegytégtzve are

present.

2. After prolcmged negetiatzions, the matter is Appe1ia.:it~-- has agreed to receive and the responderit - tiiizstirariee.__"CQmpéiV:1§?7 agreed to pay a lump sum of Rs.22,(}Qi):}'.g (Rupees., Thousand only). inclusive of i11tert3't':1vi;"~ addition has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full ofgthe eiaim. A joint Memo is filed on behalf the efieeit.

3. The respondent ~AI_nsura11ee_ to deposit the said amount, within preparation of Award, failing which _ca.ttfi} interest at 99/9 pa. Iron; the date of defatlit} dvat"e~.<)f depeeit.

4. This II1iSC611E4l'fI1f:fi)1lSV éfiépeai staxxds c3§5~;peeed {)1 in i.¢f§1'111S of ti1e..-«..T§)i11t _The' 'award of the '"}f'r:'.bunai ehaii etzamd nxodmed aceerdielglf. Dfzziw" the Award aeeordmgiy. Sd/fig Iudge We