Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mrmanoj Kumar vs Ministry Of Human Resource Development on 22 June, 2016

                     CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
       (Room No.315, B­Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066)

                       Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar)

                                     Information Commissioner

                                         CIC/SA/A/2016/001084



                                     Manoj Kumar v. MHRD, GOI
                                         Important Dates and time taken:


    RTI Application:  9­11­2015         1st Appeal: 17­12­2015              2nd Appeal: 30­3­2016

    Disposed of                         Hearing: 22­06­2016                 Decided on: 22­06­2016




Appellant: Present. 

Public Authority: Mr. Anand Kumar, Dy. Director/CPIO

FACTS: 

2.   The   appellant   sought   information   pertaining   to   incorrect   reply   received   from   NIT  Uttarakhand  dated  16.10.2015  pertaining  to  advertisement   for  appointment   of  non­teaching  staff   in   his   earlier   RTI   dated   11.09.2015.   The   appellant   filed   second   appeal   before   this  Commission.

DECISION:

3. The appellant complained that the post of junior assistant was given to a candidate who got  less marks than him in 2014.  He wanted to know the details of appointment.  The Commission  directs the NIT, Uttarakhand  to provide the certified copies of file notes, the comparative table  prepared   for   selection   committee,   the   reasons   and     qualifications   of   candidates   who   are  selected,  that  is,  Mr.  Amit  Singh,  Mr.  Ajay    Singh  and    Ms.  Pooja along  with reasons  for  rejection of the appellant,   within 25 days from the date of receipt of this order.  According to  Page 1 the OM of Dept of Personnel & Training, Govt of India,   dated 29­6­2015, the University has to  provide all the details regarding the selection of posts to all the candidates, on the official web  site,   so   that   non­selected   candidates   know   the   reasons   for   rejection   without   filing   RTI  applications. It has a duty to tell the appellant why three candidates who got marks less than  his marks are selected.  Disposed of accordingly. 

  

 (M. Sridhar Acharyulu) Information Commissioner  Authenticated true copy Deputy Registrar Order copies handed over to the parties present in th hearing, free of cost. Addresses of the parties:

1. The PIO under the RTI Act, , RTI Cell, Govt of India Ministry of HRD, Director(TE) r.no.205Shastri Bhavan New Delhi­110001
2. Shri Manoj Kumar F­113A, 2nd Floor, Sudarshan Park Page 2 Moti Nagar, New Delhi­110015 Page 3