Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Smt. Madhu Vyas vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 21 October, 2010

Author: Vineet Kothari

Bench: Vineet Kothari

                                                                            Item No. 10, DJ/-
                                                                    SBCWP NO. 9629/2010
                                                     Smt. Madhu Vyas Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.
                                                                 Order dt: 21st October, 2010


                                        1/2


     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                                    AT JODHPUR
                                     ORDER

S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9629/2010 Smt. Madhu Vyas Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.

DATE OF ORDER :::          21st October, 2010

                                    PRESENT


              HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI


Mr. Hemant Ballai, for the petitioner.

---

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court against her transfer from Government Girls Upper Primary School, Alkhasagar Kuan, Fad Bazar, Bikaner to Government Girls Upper Primary School, Jasrasar, Nokha vide order Annex-1 dated 30.09.2010. Against the said transfer order, the petitioner has already submitted a representation before the District Education Officer (Elemenatry), Bikaner on 04.10.2010 (Annex-3), but same has not been decided by said authorities till today.

3. Considering the submissions made at the bar, it is considered expedient to direct the respondents- competent authorities to decide the representation filed by the petitioner by speaking order dealing with the relevant facts and circumstances of Item No. 10, DJ/-

SBCWP NO. 9629/2010

Smt. Madhu Vyas Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.

Order dt: 21st October, 2010 2/2 the case and determine all the points raised by the petitioner separately within a period of four weeks from today. It is only after such speaking order is passed and the same is adverse to the petitioner that the petitioner is free to avail her legal remedy.

4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. A copy of this order be sent to the respondents forthwith.

(DR. VINEET KOTHARI), J.

DJ/-

10