Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Hemraj Ganeshram Patel vs Intelligence Officer And Anr on 16 January, 2023

Author: M. S. Karnik

Bench: M. S. Karnik

                      PMB                                        18.ba.4337-21.doc


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                BAIL APPLICATION NO.4337 OF 2021
                      Hemraj Ganeshram Patel                   ..Applicant
         Digitally
         signed by
         PRADNYA
PRADNYA  MAKARAND
MAKARAND BHOGALE            VS.
                      Intelligence Officer, NCB,
BHOGALE  Date:
         2023.01.16
         19:13:17
         +0530
                      Mumbai Zonal Uni, Mumbai and anr.        ..Respondents

                                              WITH
                                BAIL APPLICATION NO.4346 OF 2021
                      Hemraj Ganeshram Patel                   ..Applicant
                           VS.
                      Narcotics Control Bureau,
                      Mumbai Zonal Unit, Mumbai and anr.       ..Respondents

                                              WITH
                                BAIL APPLICATION NO.4339 OF 2021
                      Hemraj Ganeshram Patel                  ..Applicant
                            VS.
                      Intelligence Officer, NCB,
                      Mumbai Zonal Unit, Mumbai and anr.      ..Respondents
                                                ------------
                      Mr. Taraq Sayed a/w Ms. Ashwini Achari and Mr. Advait
                      Tamhankar for the Applicant.
                      Mr. Shreeram Shirsat a/w Ms. Nishi Singhvi a/w Anna
                      Oommen for respondent no.1/NCB.
                      Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State.
                                                ------------
                                             CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

                                            DATE   : JANUARY 16, 2023
                      P.C. :

                      1.       Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned

                      counsel for the respondent no.1 and learned APP for the

                      State.

                                                                               1/7
 PMB                                                   18.ba.4337-21.doc


2.      These are applications for bail by the applicant-Hemraj

Ganeshram Patel in connection with C.R. No.08 of 2020,

C.R. No.07 of 2020 and C.R. No.06 of 2020 in respect of

NDPS Special Cases Nos.887 of 2021, 994 of 2021 and 995

of 2021 respectively registered for the offence punishable

under Section 8(c) read with Sections 21(c), 23, 25, 29 and

35 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,

1985 (hereafter "the NDPS Act", for short).

3.      Mr. Shirsat, learned counsel appeared on behalf of

respondent No.1 vehemently opposed these applications for

bail.

4.      There   were     three        recoveries   made    from     the

co-accused - Shivam Hindia. A commercial quantity of

psychotropic        substances        was    recovered     from     the

co-accused.

5.      In C.R. No.06 of 2020 there is following recovery :-

             "500    tablets     of    Diazepam,    1000   tables    of
             Alprazolam and 1200 tablets of Finasteride."

6.      In C.R. No.07 of 2020 the following psychotropic

substance is recovered:-


                                                                    2/7
 PMB                                                 18.ba.4337-21.doc


           "2.36 kgs of Hashish, 705 tables of Zolpidem,
           110 tablets of Morphine, 50 tablets of Diazepam,
           950     tablets    of    Alprazolam,     30   tablets   of
           Amlodipine, 90 tablets of Modafinil and 59900
           tablets of Zopiclone."

7.    In C.R. No.8 of 2020 there is following recovery :-

           "2000    tablets    of       Diazepam,   70   tablets   of
           Tramadol, 388 tablets of Lozapam, 200 tablets of
           Zolpidem, 130 tablets of Diazem-Vulum and 510
           tablets of Alprazolam."

8.    A   huge      quantity       of     psychotropic    substance

(commercial quantity) was recovered. On the basis of the

statement of the co-accused- Shivam Hindia, the applicant

came to be arrested on 18/02/2021, 23/02/2021 and

07/03/2021 in connection with C.R. No.06 of 2020, C.R.

No.07 of 2020 and C.R. No.08 of 2020, respectively. The

entire quantity was recovered from the co-accused. The

applicant was not found in possession of any psychotropic

substance or that it is not alleged that there is any recovery

made from the applicant. Except for the statement of the

co-accused, there is no material to indicate the complicity of

the applicant.


                                                                   3/7
 PMB                                                                   18.ba.4337-21.doc


9.       Mr. Shirsat, learned counsel for the NCB relying on the

decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Narcotics           Control          Bureau          vs.      Mohit      Aggarwal 1

contended that certain conditions as laid down in Section 37

of the NDPS Act have to be satisfied before the applicant

can be enlarged on bail. It is submitted that it is on the

basis of the statement of the co-accused, huge quantity of

psychotropic substance is found. It is however submitted

that considering the quantity of psychotropic substance,

and there are as many as three recoveries made at the

instance of the co-accused, the propensity of the applicant

to commit such an offence in future cannot be ruled out.

According to him, the applicant is not entitled to be

enlarged on bail. It is submitted that even Section 29 of the

NDPS Act is applied in the present case and if there is

recovery         from      the     co-accused,          the     applicant     is   also

criminally liable under the provisions of NDPS Act.

10. Heard.            The      entire      quantity        is    found     from    the

possession of the co-accused. It is on the basis of the

statement of the co-accused, the applicant has been
1    Criminal Appeal Nos.1001-1002 of 2022 (Supreme Court of India)

                                                                                    4/7
 PMB                                               18.ba.4337-21.doc


arrested. There is no recovery made from the applicant. The

applicant   is   not   found   in   possession   of   psychotropic

substance. Apart from the statement of the co-accused,

there is no other material to show his complicity with the

said recovery. It is further submitted that the co-accused

from whom the psychotropic substance has been recovered

has been enlarged on default bail.

11. The present applicant is in custody since 18/02/2021

almost for a period of 1 year and 11 months. Except for the

statement of the co-accused that the applicant is the

supplier of the psychotropic substance, there is no material

to indicate the applicant's involvement. In my opinion, the

applicant can be released on bail, also considering the fact

that he is in custody for almost 1 year and 11 months. The

trial is not likely to conclude any time soon. I am satisfied

that the conditions requisite as prescribed under Section 37

of the NDPS Act are fulfilled in the present case. The

applicant is therefore enlarged on bail.

12.    Hence, the following order :-




                                                                5/7
 PMB                                       18.ba.4337-21.doc


                            ORDER

(a) Applications are allowed.

(b) Applicant-Hemraj Ganeshram Patel shall be released on bail in connection with C.R. No.08 of 2020, C.R. No.07 of 2020 and C.R. No.06 of 2020 in NDPS Special Cases Nos.887 of 2021, 994 of 2021 and 995 of 2021 respectively, on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.1,00,000/- in each case with one or more local sureties in the like amount.

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Officer. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence.

(d) The applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station once in fifteen (15) days of every alternate 1st and 3rd Saturday of the month 6/7 PMB 18.ba.4337-21.doc between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m. commencing from February, 2023.

(e) On being released on bail, the applicant shall furnish his contact number and residential address to the Investigating Officer and shall keep him updated, in case there is any change.

13. The Bail Applications are disposed of.

14. It is made clear that the observations are prima facie in nature only for the purpose of considering these applications for bail.

(M. S. KARNIK, J.) 7/7