Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Manohar Infrastructure And ... vs Suneel Bakshi on 26 May, 2020

Bench: Uday Umesh Lalit, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Vineet Saran

                                                                                           1

     ITEM NO.7+8                             VIRTUAL COURT NO.1           SECTION XVII-A

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.6560/2020

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-01-2020
     in IA No.13784/2019 passed by the National Consumers Disputes
     Redressal Commission, New Delhi)

     MANOHAR INFRASTRUCTURE AND
     CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. & ORS.                                     Petitioner(s)

                                                     VERSUS

     SUNEEL BAKSHI & ORS.                                               Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)

     WITH

     SLP © No.6426/2020 (SECTION XVII-A)


     Date : 26-05-2020 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN


     For Petitioner(s)                 Mr.   Siddharth Dave, Sr. Adv.
                                       Mr.   Pawan Rai, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Kamal Kumar Pandey, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Animesh Kumar, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Deepak Goel, AOR

     For Respondent(s)

                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

Mr. Siddharth Dave, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners invited our attention to the 2nd proviso to Section 19 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by MUKESH KUMAR Date: 2020.05.27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, which is to the following 15:47:17 IST Reason:

effect:
2
“Provided further that no appeal by a person, who is required to pay any amount in terms of an order of the State Commission, shall be entertained by the National Commission unless the appellant has deposited in the prescribed manner fifty per cent of the amount or rupees thirty-five thousand, whichever is less.” Mr. Dave further submitted that in the circumstances, the order directing the petitioners to deposit the entire decretal sum along with interest component ought not to have been passed by the National Commission.
Issue notice, returnable in six weeks, subject to the condition that 50% of the entire decretal sum along with interest component shall be deposited by the petitioners in the Registry of the National Commission within four weeks from today. Notice shall be issued by the Registry only after proof of deposit is filed within five weeks from today. In case, no proof of deposit is filed, these special leave petitions shall stand dismissed without further reference to Court.
     (MUKESH NASA)                                  (PRADEEP KUMAR)
     COURT MASTER                                   BRANCH OFFICER