Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

An Application For Anticipatory Bail ... vs In Re : Sudip Hira on 31 August, 2015

Author: Ashim Kumar Roy

Bench: Ashim Kumar Roy

                                                          1

29 31.8.2015                       C.R.M. No.7986 of 2015
p.d.


                       In the matter of an application for anticipatory bail under Section
                       438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure affirmed on 26.8.2015 in
                       connection with Bagdah P.S. Case No.584 dated 19.6.2015 under
                       Sections 341/323/363/366A/511/354B IPC and 12 of the
                       Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

                                                     And

               In Re : Sudip Hira ...... Petitioner.


                                  Mr. Satadru Lahiri ....For the petitioner.

                                  Mr. Subrata Roy    .... For the State.


                                  The petitioner, apprehending arrest in connection with

                       Bagdah P.S. Case No.584 dated 19.6.2015 under Sections

                       341/323/363/366A/511/354B IPC and 12 of the Protection of

                       Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, has approached this

                       court for pre-arrest bail.

                               This is a case, where the victim is a minor girl aged about

                       16 years.

                               Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the

                       parties. Perused the case diary.

                               Opposing the prayer for anticipatory bail, the learned

                       Counsel for the State draws our attention to the statement of the

                       victim recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., which is at page-17

                       of the case diary and then to the statement of the two witnesses,

                       who rescued the victim girl from the clutches of the petitioner,

                       which are at pages 19 and 20 thereof.

                                Now, having regard to what transpires from the aforesaid

                       statements, in our opinion, this is not a fit case for anticipatory

                       bail.
                          2

    Accordingly,       the      application    for

anticipatory bail stands rejected.




                   ( Ashim Kumar Roy, J. )


                ( Malay Marut Banerjee, J. )




      .

3