Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Jagram Jaiswal vs The State Of Haryana on 22 June, 2021

Bench: Vineet Saran, Dinesh Maheshwari

                                                            1

     ITEM NO.19                      Court 12 (Video Conferencing)                       SECTION II-B

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F               I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                              No(s).    4212/2021

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-04-2021
     in CRM-M No. 844/2021 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana
     At Chandigarh)

     JAGRAM JAISWAL                                                                 Petitioner(s)

                                                         VERSUS

     THE STATE OF HARYANA                                                           Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.67701/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.67704/2021-EXEMPTION FROM
     FILING O.T. and IA No.67702/2021-APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM
     FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT)

     Date : 22-06-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

     For Petitioner(s)                      Mr. Punit Vinay, AOR
                                            Mr. Arun Khatri, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)

                                 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                    O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any ground to interfere with the order passed by the High Court. However, we dispose of this petition with a direction that in case the petitioner surrenders before the Trial Court and files an application for grant of bail, the same shall be considered Signature Not Verified expeditiously and in accordance with law, preferably within a Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2021.06.22 19:40:00 IST Reason: period of two weeks from today.

2

For a period of two weeks or till the order is passed on the application, whichever is earlier, the petitioner shall not be arrested.

Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of.

(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA)                                  (NISHA TRIPATHI)
  COURT MASTER                                         BRANCH OFFICER