Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Shri.Pakkirappa S/O D. Hanumantappa vs The Management Of Nwkrtc on 13 September, 2022

                                       -1-




                                               WP No. 111764 of 2019


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022

                                    BEFORE
                       THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
                WRIT PETITION NO. 111764 OF 2019 (S-KSRTC)
            BETWEEN:

            SHRI.PAKKIRAPPA S/O D. HANUMANTAPPA
            AGE ABOUT: 40 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
            R/O: KANCHIKERI, TQ: HARPANALLI,
            DIST: DAVANAGERE.

                                                         ...PETITIONER
            (BY SRI ANANT P. SAVADI, ADVOCATE- ABSENT)

            AND:

            THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC
            REPTD BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
            DHARWAD DIVISION, DHARWAD.

                                                      ...RESPONDENT

                   THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
            THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO:-      TO ISSUE A
Digitally
signed by
SUJATA      DIRECTION OR WRIT OR ANY OTHER ORDER OR ANY WRIT IN
SUBHASH
PAMMAR
            THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE AWARD
            PASSED BY THE HON'BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR
            COURT HUBBALLI, AT: HUBBALLI AWARD PASSED IN K.I.D
            2/2014 DATED 26.11.2015 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K BE
            QUASHED.


                   THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
            COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING.
                              -2-




                                     WP No. 111764 of 2019


                          ORDER

On 10.03.2020 the following order was passed:

"The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks two weeks' time to comply with the office objections.
The petitioner shall comply with the office objections within a period of two weeks from today, subject to the condition that if the office objections are not complied within such period, the petition shall be listed for dismissal for default."

Till today office objections have not been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also absent.

The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE SSP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 27