Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Adani Enterprises Ltd vs Antikeros Shipping Corporation on 28 March, 2019

Author: S.J. Kathawalla

Bench: S.J. Kathawalla

kpd                                    1   / 2                    M-NMCDL-2015-2018.doc

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                       NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2015 OF 2018
                                             IN
                           REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 13 OF 2018
                                             IN
                     ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 57 OF 2011
Adani Enterprises Limited                                       ...        Petitioner
         Versus
Antikeros Shipping Corporation                                  ...        Respondent


Mr. Shailesh Poria alongwith Ms. Riya Dalwani instructed by Economics Laws
Practice for the Petitioner.


                                       CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.

DATED : 28th MARCH, 2019 P.C.:

1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
2. This application is for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 22 nd March, 2019.
3. In the appearances, appearance of "Mr. Vikram Nankani, Sr.Adv. a/w. Mr. Dinesh Pednekar, Ms. Ria Dalwani i/b. Economics Law Practic for the Petitioner" be read as "Mr. Vikram Nankani, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Sharan Jagtiani, Mr. Dinesh Pednekar, Ms. Rhia Marshall and Ms. Ria Dalwani instructed by Economics Laws Practice for the Petitioner".
::: Uploaded on - 30/03/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 30/03/2019 22:29:35 :::
kpd 2 / 2 M-NMCDL-2015-2018.doc
4. In paragraphs 2 and 16, "Arbitration Application No. 572 of 2011" be read as "Arbitration Application No.57 of 2011".
5. In line 3 of sub-paragraph 4.2 of paragraph 4, "the Petitioner" be read as "the Respondent".
6. In line 2 of paragraph 5, "the Petitioner" be read as "the Respondent".
7. In paragraphs 6 and 7, wherever "Mr. Nankhani" appears, the same be read as "Mr. Nankani".
8. In line 5 of paragraph 7, "clause" be read as "cause".
9. The application for speaking to the minutes of order dated 22 nd March, 2019 is accordingly disposed off.

( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ) ::: Uploaded on - 30/03/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 30/03/2019 22:29:35 :::