Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

A.Mukundan vs The Contonment Board on 5 October, 2021

Author: K.Kalyanasundaram

Bench: K.Kalyanasundaram, V.Sivagnanam

                                                                           W.P.No.15385 of 2018



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 05.10.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
                                                        and
                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
                                               W.P.No.15385 of 2018
                                           and W.M.P.No.21595 of 2021
                     A.Mukundan
                                                                              ...Petitioner
                                                        Vs.
                     1.The Contonment Board,
                     St.Thomas Mount-cum-Pallavaram,
                     Represented by its,
                     The Chief Executive Officer/Member Secretary,
                     North Parade Road, St.Thomas Mount,
                     Chennai - 600 016.
                     2.The Tahsildar,
                     Alandur Taluk,
                     14, Diary Farm Road, St. Thomas Mount,
                     Near Alandur Court,
                     Chennai 600 061.
                     3.Mrs.Malathi
                     4.Mr.Maran
                     5.Mr.Devan
                     6.The Defence Estate Officer, (Madras Circle),
                     No.306, Anna Salai, Teynampet,
                     Chennai - 600 018.
                     (R6 impleaded vide order dated 16.04.2021made in
                     WMP.No.22604/2018 in W.P.No.15385 of 2018 by NKKJ and TVTSJ)
                                                                         ... Respondents


                     1/9


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  W.P.No.15385 of 2018



                     Prayer:      Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd
                     respondent to initiate appropriate action under Section 252 of the
                     Cantonment Act, 2006 and the regulations thereon, to remove the
                     encroachments, structures raised by the respondents 3, 4 and 5 at "Harbour
                     Line 20 feet Road, St.Anthony's Church Cross Street" having a length of
                     100 mtrs and thereabouts and a breadth of 5 feet and to maintain the sanctity
                     of the road to make hassle free ingress and egress through the Thirusulam
                     Road and the Harbour Line Road as a through fare.

                                    For petitioner          : Mr.P.G.Thiyagu

                                    For respondents         : Mr.C.Mohan
                                                              for King and Patridge for R1
                                                              Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik
                                                              Govt. Advocate for R2
                                                              Mr.Amar D.Pandiyan for R4
                                                              Mr.G.Ilangovan for R6
                                                              No Appearance for R3 and R5


                                                        ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J) This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to initiate appropriate action under Section 252 of the Cantonment Act, 2006, to remove the encroachment made by the 3, 4 and 5 at "Harbour Line 20 feet Road, St.Anthony's Church Cross Street.

2/9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.15385 of 2018

2. Mr.C.Mohan, learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent and Mr.G.Ilangovan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 6th respondent would state that based on the representation of the petitioner, the officials conducted a joint survey and found encroachment in the Harbour Line 20 feet Road, St.Anthony's Church Cross Street. The learned counsel relying upon the order passed in W.P.No.14244 of 2016, dated 13.04.2017, seeks directions to the police authority to provide necessary assistance at the time of removal of encroachment.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the private respondents would submits that the petitioner has already approached the Civil Court and the suit instituted by him is pending since 2017, hence, the petitioner has to workout his remedy before the Civil Court and the present writ petition is not maintainable.

4. We are unable to agree with the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the private respondents. In the instant case, it is not in dispute that the petitioner seeks removal of encroachment in the public 3/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.15385 of 2018 road. According to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 6, in a joint survey conducted by them, encroachment made in the public road was found and they have initiated proceedings to remove the encroachment.

5. It is informed that encroachments have been made in two places, one under the jurisdiction of the 1st respondent and another under the jurisdiction of 6th respondent.

6. In the light of the above fact, we hereby direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action in accordance with law, after providing ample opportunity to all the necessary parties. At the time of removal of encroachment, the Deputy Director, St.Thomas Mount and the District Police shall render necessary assistance to the respondents 1 and 6 for eviction in terms of Section 315 of the Cantonments Act 2006. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4/9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.15385 of 2018

7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

                                                                   [M.K.K.S.J]      [V.S.G.J]
                                                                            05.10.2021

                     Index: Yes/no
                     Speaking Order: Yes/no
                     ub

                     To
                     1.The Contonment Board,
                     St.Thomas Mount-cum-Pallavaram,
                     Represented by its,

The Chief Executive Officer/Member Secretary, North Parade Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai - 600 016.

2.The Tahsildar, Alandur Taluk, 14, Diary Farm Road, St. Thomas Mount, Near Alandur Court, Chennai 600 061.

3.The Defence Estate Officer, (Madras Circle), No.306, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018.

5/9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.15385 of 2018 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J and V.SIVAGNANAM, J ub W.P.No.15385 of 2018 05.10.2021 6/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.15385 of 2018 W.P.No.15385 of 2021 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

and V.SIVAGNANAM, J This matter is posted today under the caption for 'Being mentioned'.

2.It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent that while disposing of the writ petition, this Court observed at para 6 of the order that the Deputy Commissioner, St. Thomas Mount District Police shall render necessary assistance to the respondents 1 and 6 for eviction in terms of Section 315 of the Cantonments Act 2006. But in the order, it was wrongly typed as the Deputy Director, St. Thomas Mount and the District Police, instead of the Deputy Commissioner, St. Thomas Mount District Police. Hence, the learned counsel seeks for rectification.

3.In view of the above submission, the Registry is directed to carry out the above said correction in 6th paragraph of the order by incorporating the designation “Deputy Commissioner, St.Thomas Mount 7/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.15385 of 2018 District Police” in the place of designation “Deputy Director, St.Thomas Mount and the District Police” and issue fresh order copy.



                     Index :Yes/No                              [M.K.K.S.J]     [V.S.G.J]
                     Internet:Yes/No                                    29.10.2021
                     skn




                     8/9


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.15385 of 2018 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

and V.SIVAGNANAM, J skn W.P.No.15385 of 2021 29.10.2021 9/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/