Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Hakeem Naseem-Ur-Rahman And Another vs State Of U.P. And Others on 5 January, 2012

Author: Rajes Kumar

Bench: Rajes Kumar





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 38
 

 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 511 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Hakeem Naseem-Ur-Rahman And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
 
Petitioner Counsel :- J.J.Munir
 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Kumar Shukla
 

 
Hon'ble Rajes Kumar,J.
 

The petitioners are permitted to implead Sri Ahmad Rasheed, son of Hamid Rasheed, R/o Mohalla Milkiyan Qasba Seohara District Bijnor as respondent no. 5, who has filed caveat and are represented by Sri Ramesh Kumar Shukla and Sri Anil Sharma, Advocates.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that against the same impugned order, another committee of management has filed Writ Petition No. 73145 of 2011.

Connect it with Writ Petition No. 73145 of 2011.

Learned Standing Counsel may file counter affidavit within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks.

List this case thereafter. 

Order Date :- 5.1.2012 OP