Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Rajendrakumar Surpalbhai Patel Thro' ... vs State Of Gujarat & on 8 February, 2016

Author: Harsha Devani

Bench: Harsha Devani, G.R.Udhwani

                 R/CR.MA/3116/2016                                             ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

          CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 3116 of
                                             2016

                          In CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1387 of 2011

         ==========================================================
             RAJENDRAKUMAR SURPALBHAI PATEL THRO' MAHESHKUMAR
                        SURPALBHAI PATEL....Applicant(s)
                                   Versus
                     STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         HCLS COMMITTEE, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         MR. HARDIK C THAKKAR, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         MR. HARDIK SONI, ADDITINAL, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
         Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI
                        and
                        HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.UDHWANI

                                     Date : 08/02/2016


                                      ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) Heard Mr. Hardik Thakkar, learned advocate, for the applicant.

Issue rule returnable on 10.2.2016. Mr. Hardik Soni, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor shall call Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Wed Feb 10 01:48:03 IST 2016 R/CR.MA/3116/2016 ORDER for a report from the concerned police station ascertaining from the concerned doctor namely Dr. K.R. Damor of Janani Hospital as to why the applicant's wife who is only 36 years old is required to undergo hysterectomy at this age.

(HARSHA DEVANI, J.) (G.R.UDHWANI, J.) (pkn) Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Wed Feb 10 01:48:03 IST 2016