Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Raj Kol @ Kailash Kol vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 August, 2014

                          Criminal Appeal No.1478/2014                  

  13.08
       .2014:
             
                       Shri Pushpraj Singh, Advocate for the appellant.
                       Shri   R.K.   Kesharwani,   Panel   Lawyer   for   the 
                respondent­State.

Heard   on  I.A.   No.10472/2014,   an   application   for  suspension   of   sentence   and   grant   of   bail   on   behalf   of   the  appellant.

The  appellant  has been  convicted  under  Section  376  (2)   (g)   of   IPC   and   sentenced   to   undergo   rigorous  imprisonment   of   10   years   and   Rs.5,000/­,   with   default  stipulation.

Learned   counsel   for   the   appellant   submits   that   the  appellant   has   been   falsely   implicated   in   the   matter.   It   is  further   submitted  that  the  prosecutrix   is   a  major   girl  and  has   never   complained   anywhere   while   visiting   at   various  places   with   the   appellant,   hence,   is   a   consenting   party.  There   are   material   contradiction   and   omission   in   the  statement of prosecution witnesses. The appellant is in jail  since the date of his arrest. He also submits that there is no  likelihood   of   coming   up   of   this   appeal   for   final   hearing   in  near future.

Learned Panel Lawyer for the State opposes the prayer  for suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

On due consideration of the facts and circumstances  of the case and the nature of allegation, this application is  allowed. Execution of jail sentence of the appellant ­Raj Kol  @ Kailash Kol  is suspended. He is directed to be enlarged  on   bail   on     furnishing   a   personal   bond   in   the   sum   of  Rs.30,000/­ (Rupees Thirty Thousand only)  and a surety  bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court for  his appearance before the Registry of this Court on 6th April,  2015  and   on   such   other   dates   as   may   be   fixed   by   the  Registry in this regard.

It   is   made   clear   that   the   sentence   of   fine   is   not  suspended. 

List this case for final hearing in due course.  C.C. as per rules. 

          (SUBHASH KAKADE)                                   JUDGE taj/-