Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Mohammed Badruddin Ajmal vs Kamalakhya Dey Purkayastha And 2 Ors on 21 January, 2026

                                                                          Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010021472025




                                                                   undefined

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : Crl.Pet./100/2025

            MOHAMMED BADRUDDIN AJMAL
            S/O LATE AJMAL ALI HAJI ABDUL MAJID, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
            DONKIGAON, PO AND PS HOJAI, DIST HOJAI, ASSAM 782435

            VERSUS

            KAMALAKHYA DEY PURKAYASTHA AND 2 ORS.
            S/O LATE KAUSHIK RANJAN DEY PURKAYASTHA RESIDENTOF SUBHASH
            NAGAR, SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ) TOWN, PO AND PS SRIBHUMI
            (KARIMGANJ) , DIST SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ) , ASSAM 788710

            2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
             REPRESENTED BY PP
            ASSAM

            3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
             KARIMGANJ POLICE STATION PO AND PS SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ)
             DIST SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ)
            ASSAM
             PIN78871

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. M K HUSSAIN, MR. M ALOM,MS. F H AHMED,MRS. S Y
AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MD. A H LASKAR (R-1),MRS. S GOSWAMI (R-
1),MR. R GUPTA (R-1)


                                      BEFORE
                       HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA


                                          ORDER

Page No.# 2/2 Date : 21.01.2026.

Heard Mr. M.K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Das, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3. None is present on behalf of private respondent No.1, although the name of Mrs. S. Goswami and her colleagues are shown as the counsel for the respondent No.1 in the cause list.

The scanned copy of the TCR has already been received.

Let the matter be listed after two (2) weeks on a date to be fixed by the Registry.

Till then, the interim order passed earlier shall continue.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant