Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Samsul Hoque vs The Union Of India And 7 Ors on 5 February, 2020

Author: Manish Choudhury

Bench: Manish Choudhury

                                                                          Page No. 1/2

GAHC010143142019




                        THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                            Case No. : WP(C) 4316/2019

         1:SAMSUL HOQUE
         S/O. LT. IMAN ALI, VILL. SIDHANI, P.O. SITOLI, P.S. BAGHBOR, DIST.
         BARPETA, PIN-781308.

         VERSUS

         1:THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS.
         REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, DEPTT. OF HOME, NEW
         DELHI-01.

         2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
          REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          DEPTT. OF HOME
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI-06.

         3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION
         ASSAM
          HOUSEFED
          GUWAHATI-06.

         4:THE DY. COMMISSION
          BARPETA-781301.

         5:THE SUPDT. OF POLICE (B)
          BARPETA
          PIN-781301.

         6:THE ELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER
          BARPETA
          PIN-781301.

         7:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE (B)
          BAGBOR
                                                                                  Page No. 2/2

             DIST. BARPETA
             PIN-781308.

            8:THE FOREIGNERS TRIBUNAL
             BARPETA
             PIN-781301
             REP. BY THE STANDING COUNSEL
             GUWAHATI HIGH COURT-01

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. A ROSHID

Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.

                                     BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

                                             ORDER

Date : 05-02-2020 On 20.11.2019, Mr. J. Payeng, learned Standing Counsel, FT had prayed for and was granted 2 (two) weeks' time to obtain further instruction and furnish the fresh case number of the proceeding initiated under the IMDT Act, lying against the petitioner.

Ms. M. Barua, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. J. Payeng, learned Standing Counsel, FT today submits that no instruction has yet been received as regards the fresh case number and she has again prayed for and is granted 2 (two) weeks' time to obtain necessary instruction of the case.

List the matter, on 24.02.2020.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant