Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Ashok Kumar vs Sankarankutty Pillai on 9 March, 2020

Author: Devan Ramachandran

Bench: Devan Ramachandran

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

     MONDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 19TH PHALGUNA, 1941

                       RFA.No.390 OF 2003(C)

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 301/1996 DATED 23-10-2003 OF SUB COURT,
                           MAVELIKKARA


APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:

             ASHOK KUMAR
             NALLAVEETTIL THARAYIL, NADUVILE MURI,
             PADANILAM PO, NOORNADU.

             BY ADVS.
             SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR
             SMT.SREELATHA PARAMESWARAN NAIR
             SRI.T.S.SARATH
             SMT.UMA

RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

      1      SANKARANKUTTY PILLAI
             KAVINTE PADEETTATHIL,
             THRIKKUNNAPPUZHA THEEKKU MURI, SOORANAD SOUTH, KOLLAM
             NOW WORKING AT ALSAFI DAIRY ESTABLISHMENT,
             P.B.NO.580, ALBANA, K.S.A.

      2      VIJAYALEKSHMI (DIED, LEGAL HEIRS IMPLEADED)
             ATHIRA NILAYAM, PATHARAM, SOORANAD, KOLLAM.

      3*     ATHIRA SUNITH
             ATHIRA NILAYAM, (KAVINTE PADEETTATHIL),
             SOORANAD SOUTH, KAKKAKUNNU P.O., KOLLAM.

      4*     ARUN SANKAR
             ATHIRA NILAYAM, (KAVINTE PADEETTATHIL),
             SOORANAD SOUTH, KAKKAKUNNU P.O., KOLLAM.

      5*     ANJALI ARUN
             ATHIRA NILAYAM, (KAVINTE PADEETTATHIL),
             SOORANAD SOUTH, KAKKAKUNNU P.O., KOLLAM.
             *(THE LEGAL HEIRS OF THE DECEASED SECOND RESPONDENT
             ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5 VIDE
             ORDER DATED 10/10/19 IN IA 1/19.)

             R1 BY ADV. SRI.O.V.RADHAKRISHNAN (SR.)
             R1, R3-5 BY ADV. SMT.K.RADHAMANI AMMA
 RFA.No.390 OF 2003              2

             R1 BY ADV. SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH


     THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
09.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 RFA.No.390 OF 2003                  3

                            JUDGMENT

Even though this matter was called more than once today, there was no representation for the appellant. I, therefore, suspect that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this matter any further. Accordingly, this R.F.A. is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE MC/17.3.2020