Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Abhishek Kumar Parganiha vs Union Of India 33 Wps/1881/2018 Bihari ... on 28 February, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                         1

                                                                               NAFR

             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                               WPS No. 5655 of 2016

        Abhishek Kumar Parganiha S/o Anil Kumar Parganiha, Aged About 28
        Years R/o Near A.K. Medical Store In Front Of Kusum Tai Dapke School,
        Tatyapara, P.S. And Post Raipur, Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

                                                                      ---- Petitioner

                                      Versus

     1. Union Of India S/o Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Finance
        Department, New Delhi, 110067 North Block, Delhi

     2. All India Council For Technical Education, Through Its Chairman Nelson
        Mandela Marg Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110067, Delhi

     3. Institute Of Bank Personal Selection I.B.P.S., Through Director I.B.P.S.
        House 90 Feet D.P. Road Near Thakur Polytechnic Office Western Express
        Highway, Kandivali (E) Mumbai (Maharastra).

     4. University Of Pune, Through          Its   Registrar,   Ganeshkhind,    Pune
        Maharasthra, , Maharashtra

     5. Canara Bank Through Assistant General Manager Recruitment Cell,
        Human Resource Wing Head Office Jeevan Prakash Building, 113/1, J.C.
        Road, Banglore Karnataka, Karnataka

                                                                   ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Jitendra Gupta and Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate for respective respondents. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28/02/18

1. Heard on I.A. No. 04- application for withdrawal of writ petition.

2. Upon due consideration, the I.A. No. 04 is allowed.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty 2 reserved in favour of the petitioner as prayed in the application, to press the representation filed for redressal of his grievances.

SD/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka