Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Mr.Ketan Shah vs Shradha Anilkant Shah on 19 January, 2011

  
 
 
 
 BEFORE THE HON



 

 
    
     
     


       
          
           
           


          BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 
        
         
           
           


          COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
        
      
    
     

 
  
   
     
     

 
  
   
     
     
        
         
         
            
             
             


            First Appeal No. A/08/165
          
           
             
             


            (Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. CC/06/318 of District 
            Mumbai(Suburban))
          
        
         

 
      
       
         
         

 
      
       
         
         
            
             
             
                
                 
                 

1.

MR.KETAN SHAH R/o.B-1602, Kia park, Veera Desai Road Andheri(W), Mumbai 400 053   ...........Appellant(s) Versus

1. SHRADHA ANILKANT SHAH B-1/8 Scindia Society, Off Sir M V Road Andheri(E), Mumbai 400 069

2. University of Mumbai University Building Fort Mumbai 400 032   ...........Respondent(s)       BEFORE:

   
Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase PRESIDENT   Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode Judicial Member   Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar Member     PRESENT:
Mr.Vardhan Desai-Advocate for the appellant   Mr.Dinesh Patankar-Advocate for respondent no.2   ORDER Per Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase, Hon'ble President         Heard Ld.counsel for the appellant at length.  Ultimately on instructions he submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the appeal.  Allowed to be withdrawn.
       Counsel for the appellant and counsel for the respondent no.2 makes a statement that in the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum an amount of `61,000/- has been already deposited i.e. appellant has deposited an amount of `30,000/- and University of Mumbai has deposited `31,000/- and, thus, we find that the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum appears to have been satisfied.  However, complainant is not present before us even though complainant is served.  However, taking into consideration statements made by both the counsels we direct Registrar to return the amount which is deposited by the appellant under section 15 proviso of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.  Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.  Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.
 Pronounced Dated 19th January, 2011       [Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase] PRESIDENT       [Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode] Judicial Member       [Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar] Member     Ms.