Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 5]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Sandeep Kumar Pandey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 December, 2014

                            Misc. Criminal Case No.18758/2014
10.12.2014:
                     Shri   Arubendra   Singh   Parihar,   Advocate   for   the 
              applicant.
                     Shri   Umesh   Pandey,   Government   Advocate   for   the 
              respondent­State.

Heard on admission. 

Admit. 

Case diary is available.

With   the   consent   of   the   parties   the   case   is   heard  finally.

This is the first bail application filed by the applicant  under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

The applicant is in custody in connection with Crime  No.339/2014,   registered   at   Police   Station   Amarpatan,  District   Satna,   for   the   offences   punishable   under   Sections  376 (1) of IPC, Section 3/4 of Protection of Children From  Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and 3 (2) (v) of SC/ST (Prevention  of Atrocities) Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has  falsely been implicated in the case. It is further submitted by  the learned counsel for the applicant that there is a delay in  lodging   of   FIR.   The   medical   evidence   do   not   support   the  prosecution case. The prosecutrix is aged 16 years and also  she was a consenting party. The applicant is a young person  and is in custody since 01.09.2014, having no past criminal  antecedents.   In   view   of   the   aforesaid,   prayer   is   made   to  enlarge the  applicant on bail.

On the other hand, learned Government Advocate for  the State  has vehemently opposed the application for grant  of bail. 

Looking   to   the   facts   and   circumstances   of   the   case,  without   expressing   any   view   on   merits   of   the   case   and  considering the averments made by learned counsel for the  parties, the application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. may be  accepted. Consequently, it is hereby allowed.

It   is   directed   that   the  applicant­  Sandeep   Kumar  Pandey be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in  the sum of Rs.30,000/­ (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) with  one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of  the   Committal   Court/trial   Court   to   appear   before   the  concerned Court on the dates given by the concerned Court  during trial. 

C.C. as per rules.

      (Subhash Kakade)                   Judge                    taj.