Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Pratyaha News Services Private Limited vs Pratidin Prakashani Private Limited on 24 June, 2015

Author: Debangsu Basak

Bench: Debangsu Basak

ORDER SHEET
                                 CA 206 of 2015
                        IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                               Original Jurisdiction
                                 ORIGINAL SIDE


                              IN THE MATTER OF :
                   PRATYAHA NEWS SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
                                     AND
                     PRATIDIN PRAKASHANI PRIVATE LIMITED

  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK
  Date : 24th June, 2015.
                                                                    Appearance:
                                                      Ms.Manju Bhuteria, Advocate
                                                         Ms.Atasi Sarkar, Advocate

                                                            Md.Sharif Ali, Advocate


      The Court : The application is for convening a meeting of the equity share

holders of the applicant companies in respect of a scheme of amalgamation

proposed between two applicants. By the proposed scheme of amalgamation the

applicant no.1 is sought to be merged with the applicant no.2.

      The Central Bureau of Investigation had issued a notice with regard to one

of the shareholders of the applicant no.2. Consequently, by my order dated May

11, 2015 I had required to the applicants to serve notice of this application on

the Central Bureau of Investigation. The Central Bureau of Investigation has

since been served with a copy of the application. Learned Counsel appearing for

the Central Bureau of Investigation had sought an adjournment on June 3, 2015

to take instructions.

      Learned Counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation referring to the

written instruction dated June 16, 2015 given to him submits that the Central
                                         2


Bureau of Investigation has no objection to the application. The application may

be considered in accordance with law. He submits that the written instruction

may be kept with the record. The written instruction dated June 16, 2015 be

kept with the record.

      In such circumstances, the following order is passed :-

      1.

A meeting of the members holding Equity Shares of the applicant no.1 abovenamed shall be convened and held at Premises No.11, Hungerford Street, 2nd Floor, Kolkata-700 017, on Saturday the 1st day of August, 2015 at 11.00 A.M. in the morning for the purpose of considering and if thought fit, approving, with or without modification, the scheme of amalgamation proposed to be made between PRATYAHA NEWS SERVICE PRIVATE LIMITED and PRATIDIN PRAKASHANI PRIVATE LIMITED and the respective equity shareholders of the said companies.

2. A meeting of the members holding Equity Shares of the applicant no.2 abovenamed shall be convened and held at Premises No.20, Prafulla Sarkar Street, Kolkata-700 072, on Saturday the 1st day of August, 2015 at 11.30 A.M. in the morning for the purpose of considering and if thought fit, approving, with or without modification, the scheme of amalgamation proposed to be made between PRATYAHA NEWS SERVICE PRIVATE LIMITED and PRATIDIN PRAKASHANI PRIVATE LIMITED and the respective equity shareholders of the said companies.

3. At least 21(twenty one) days before the day appointed for the meetings, an advertisement convening the same and stating that copies of the said scheme 3 of amalgamation and the of the statement required to be furnished pursuant to Section 393 of the Companies Act, 1956 and forms of proxy can be obtained free of charge at the registered office of the applicants or at the office of their Advocates-on-Record, M/s. Victor Moses & Co., 6, Old Post Office Street, Ground Floor, Kolkata - 700 001, be inserted once in "Bartaman" and once in "Business Standard". Advertisement in the Calcutta Gazette is dispensed with.

4. In addition, at least 21 (twenty one) clear days before the meetings to be held as aforesaid, notices convening the said meetings at the place and time as aforesaid together with a copy of the said scheme, a copy of the statement required to be sent under Section 393 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the prescribed form of proxy be sent by registered post or by hand through personal messenger addressed to each of the equity shareholders in the applicants at their respective last known addresses.

5. The Advocates-on-Record for the applicants abovenamed do within seven days (after obtaining an authenticated copy of this order) from the date of obtaining this order file in Court, the form of the notices and the statement to accompany the notices and the same shall be settled by Assistant Registrar (Company) of this Court.

6. Mr.Sutanu Chakraborty, Advocate, shall be the Chairperson for the said meeting of the applicant no.1 to be held as aforesaid at a remuneration of 1200 GMs.

7. Mr.Amitava Deb, Advocate, shall be the Chairperson for the said meeting of the applicant no.2 to be held as aforesaid at a remuneration of 1200 GMs. 4

8. The Chairperson appointed for the said meeting or any person authorized by them do issue and send out the notices of the said meetings referred to above.

9. The quorum for the said meeting of the equity shareholders of the applicant no.1 shall be fixed at two persons present either in person or by proxy.

10. The quorum for the said meeting of the equity shareholders of the applicant no.2 shall be fixed at two persons present either in person or by proxy.

11. Voting by proxy be permitted provided that a proxy in the prescribed form duly signed by the person(s) entitled to attend and vote at the meetings are filed with the applicants at their respective registered offices not later than 48 hours before the meetings. The Chairpersons shall have the power to adjourn the meetings, if necessary.

12. The value of each member shall be in accordance with the books of the applicants and where entries in the books are disputed, the Chairpersons shall determine the value for the purpose of the meetings.

13. The Chairpersons do report to this Court the result of the said meetings within three weeks from the date of the conclusion of the said meetings. The said reports shall be verified by affidavits.

14. Summons be signed as of date. CA No.206 of 2015 is disposed of. No order as to costs.

(DEBANGSU BASAK, J.) S.Das AR[CR] 5