Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 8]

Allahabad High Court

U.P. State Road Transport Corp. Thru' ... vs Ramu Kashyap & Another on 12 August, 2010

Author: Pankaj Mithal

Bench: Pankaj Mithal

Court No. - 19

Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 1339 of 2010

Petitioner :- U.P. State Road Transport Corp. Thru' Regional Manager
Respondent :- Ramu Kashyap & Another
Petitioner Counsel :- Ashok Kumar

Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.

Against the award of tribunal dated 9.11.2009 awarding compensation of Rs.23,800/-, appellant has preferred this first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988. The appeal is reported to be beyond time by 170 days. In the delay condonation application no explanation whatsoever for the delay has been given. The only thing stated is that the appeal was delayed for want of permission from higher authorities of the claim tribunal. It is not understandable as to why the appellant required permission from the higher authority of the claim tribunal. There is no averment that the delay has occurred on account of delay in obtaining permission from the higher authorities of the appellant. No details as to when papers papers were sent or or placed before the higher authorities for getting the sanction or approval for filing the appeal has been disclosed.

In view of above, the delay in filing the appeal remains unexplained. As such, the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is rejected. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as barred by time.

Order Date :- 12.8.2010 BK