Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S. Texonic vs The Chairman on 22 April, 2021

Author: R.Mahadevan

Bench: R.Mahadevan

                                                                        W.P. No. 10028 of 2021


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 22.04.2021

                                                      CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

                                              W.P. No. 10028 of 2021
                                                       and
                                             W.M.P. No. 10654 of 2021

                     M/s. Texonic
                     Represented by its Partner
                     Naveen Bhandari
                     No.9, Athipattan Street
                     Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.                       ...Petitioner

                                                               Vs.

                     1. The Chairman
                        TANGEDCO
                        144, Anna Salai
                        Chennai – 600 002.

                     2. Chief Financial Controller (General)
                        TANGEDCO
                        7th Floor, 144, Anna Salai
                        Chennai – 600 0027.

                     3. The Chief Engineer, NCES
                        TANGEDCO
                        Second Floor
                        144, Anna Salai
                        Chennai – 600 002.



                     1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                            W.P. No. 10028 of 2021


                     4. The Superintending Engineer
                        TANGEDCO, Tirunelveli EDC
                        Tirunelveli – 627 011.

                     5. The Superintending Engineer
                        Dindigul EDC, TANGENDCO
                        Dindigul.                                                   ... Respondents

                               Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying
                     for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents for
                     termination of the PPA dated 29.01.2018 and 13.08.2019 and to execute
                     energy wheeling agreement for Third Party Sale.


                                         For Petitioner      :     Mr. T.Chezhiyan

                                         For Respondents     :     Mr. N.Damodharan
                                                                       Standing Counsel

                                                            ORDER

Seeking a direction to the Respondents for termination of the Energy Purchase Agreements (EPA) dated 29.01.2018 and 13.08.2019 and to execute the Energy Wheeling Agreement (EWA) for third party sale, the present writ petition came to be filed by the petitioner.

2.It is the case of the petitioner that they are having 2 Windmills with 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 10028 of 2021 a capacity of 800 KW each bearing WF HT SC Nos.1736 and 059214500041 (Old No.D-41) (Group-II) and they entered into Energy Purchase Agreements dated 29.01.2018 and 13.08.2019 with the fourth and fifth respondents respectively. As per the said Agreement, the payment to WEG in respect of energy supplied shall be within 30 days from the receipt of the Bill. Contrary to the same, the respondent TANGEDCO failed to make any payment, despite raising invoices by the petitioner every month. The total outstanding due for the wind electric generators till March, 2021, is Rs.1,15,97,911/-. Therefore, invoking clause 8(b) of the Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA), the petitioner sent notice dated 18.02.2021 to the third and fourth respondents seeking migration of EPA to EWA. Finding no response on the same, they have come up with this writ petition for the aforesaid relief.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved herein has already been considered and decided by this Court vide order dated 30.08.2019 in W.P. No. 5196 of 2019 etc. batch, the operative portion of which is usefully extracted hereunder:

“29. Thus, for the reasons stated above, the Writ Petitions deserve to be allowed with the following 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 10028 of 2021 directions:-
(a)the respondents /TANGEDCO are directed to permit the Petitioners to switch over to captive consumption so as to use the same for their own industry;
(b)the respondents/ TANGEDCO are directed to settle the respective dues to the Petitioners as per their respective invoices raised by them, along with interest as per Clause 6(b), within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(c)Consequently, in view of permitting the petitioners to migrate from EPA to EWA, the proceedings dated 20.05.2017 of the first respondent deciding not to concede any request for migration is set aside.

30.In fine, with the above directions, the writ petitions stand allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.” The learned counsel further submitted that as against the aforesaid order, the respondent TANGEDCO filed an appeal in WA.No.4189 of 2019 etc. batch, which were dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court on 18.02.2020; and the further appeal in SLP Nos.8513 – 8518 of 2020 before the Supreme Court also ended in dismissal, by order dated 24.09.2020. Hence, the learned counsel prayed for similar order in this writ petition as well.

4.The submissions so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 10028 of 2021 have been fairly conceded by the learned Standing Counsel taking notice for the respondents.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also following the earlier order of this Court (cited supra), this writ petition stands disposed of, in the same lines as done in W.P. No. 5196 of 2019, etc. batch. dated 30.08.2019. With regard to the consideration of the application for migration, the respondents shall pass appropriate orders, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.




                                                                                          22.04.2021
                     Index          : Yes/No
                     Internet       : Yes/No
                     Maya

                                                                             R.MAHADEVAN, J.

                                                                                                  Maya
                     To
                     1. The Chairman, TANGEDCO
                        144, Anna Salai
                        Chennai – 600 002.

2. Chief Financial Controller (General) TANGEDCO 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 10028 of 2021 7th Floor, 144, Anna Salai Chennai – 600 0027.

3. The Chief Engineer, NCES TANGEDCO, Second Floor 144, Anna Salai Chennai – 600 002.

4. The Superintending Engineer TANGEDCO, Tirunelveli EDC Tirunelveli – 627 011.

5. The Superintending Engineer Dindigul EDC TANGENDCO, Dindigul.

W.P. No. 10028 of 2021

Dated : 22.04.2021 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/