Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Ashis Kumar Sarkar vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 April, 2013

Author: Biswanath Somadder

Bench: Biswanath Somadder

                                        1



04.04.2013
   (PP)
                         W. P. No. 10765 (W) of 2012

                        Ashis Kumar Sarkar
                                  Vs.
                      The State of West Bengal & Ors.


                     Mr. Dibyendu Chatterjee
                                          .....for the petitioner.

                     Mr. Sailaja Nanda Bhattacharyya
                                               .....for the State.



                     Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and

             upon perusing the instant application, it appears that the

             petitioner's marks have already been re-evaluated based on an

             earlier order passed in W. P. 10314 (W) of 2011.

                    However, the petitioner has now approached this Court

             seeking further re-evaluation of his marks, since it transpires that

             the marks of the petitioner, upon re-evaluation in terms of the

             order of the Court, has now been reduced.          This Court, while

             passing the earlier order dated 10th January, 2012, in W. P. 10314

             (W) of 2011, had directed the concerned authority to take steps to

             re-evaluate the answer script of the writ petitioner in terms of the

             procedure    generally   adopted   by   the   concerned   respondent

authorities for evaluation of such answer scripts. This Court had never observed that such evaluation would be only an upward re- 2 evaluation. Re-evaluation of the answer scripts has resulted in reduction of the marks that were originally allotted in favour of the petitioner.

In such circumstances, there is no scope for this Court to once again order for further re-evaluation of the answer scripts of the petitioner.

As such, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed.

(Biswanath Somadder, J.)