Karnataka High Court
Sri Muniraju vs State Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2025
Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar
Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:26122
CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9615 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MUNIRAJU
SON OF SRI VENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
RESIDING AT SAMPANGERE VILLAGE,
LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, MALUR 563 139
2. SRI MURALIDHAR
S/O. N. V. VENKATASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/A. MALUR TOWN, MALUR TALUK,
MALUR 563 139
3. SRI. KAKAPPA
S/O. MUNISHAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by R/A. MAKARAHALLI VILLAGE,
CHANDANA TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
BM KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka 4. SRI NARAYANASWAMY,
S/O MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/O MYLANDAHALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139.
5. SRI NARAYANASWAMY,
S/O CHINNAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/O SANTHEHALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:26122
CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025
HC-KAR
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139.
6. SRI SHANMUGA,
S/O RAVIKUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
R/O GANDHI CIRCLE
MALUR TOWN,MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563139
7. SRI S M VENKATESH
S/O. MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
R/O SONNAHALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563 139.
8. SRI VIJAY KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/O CHEVENAHALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI
S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA,
MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
9. SRI A K VENKATESH
S/O KAVERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
R/O ETTAKODI VILLAGE
LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
10. SRI VENKATESH
S/O. RAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/O LAKKUR HOBLI,
MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
11. SRI HANUMANTHAREDDY
S/O ANJANEYAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/O MALUR TOWN,
MALUR TALUK,
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:26122
CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025
HC-KAR
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
12. SRI ZABEULLA
S/O MASTHANBAIG,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/O MOTTAN MARKET ROAD,
MALUR TOWN MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
13. SRI SHABEER ULLA @ SHABEER AHAMED
S/O AMANULLA M.M,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/O KHAZI MANZIL,
MALUR TOWN MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
14. SRI RAMESH J K @ VEERAPPA V
S/O VENKATASWAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/O BYLAHALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI
MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
15. SRI VENKATARAM
S/O NAGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
R/O M. GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE,
MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
16. SRI SANTHOSH @ SANTHOSH KUMAR
S/O VENKATESHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
R/O MALUR TOWN,
MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
17. SRI K V GOPAL
S/O OJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
S/O KADUR VILLAGE,
MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
-4-
NC: 2025:KHC:26122
CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025
HC-KAR
18. SRI ESHWAR @ LAWYER ESHWAR
S/O YALLAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/O KUPPAR VILLAGE,
MASTHI HOBLI MALUR TALUK, KOLAR
DISTRICT-563139
19. SRI PARAMESH
S/O VENKATESHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/O SAMPANGERE VILLAGE,
LAKKUR HOBLI MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
20. SRI VIJAYENDRA
S/O YALLAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/O SAMPANGERE VILLAGE,
LAKKUR HOBLI MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
21. SRI. RAMESH @ BEDASHETTI HALLI RAMESH
S/O MALLAPPA,
AGED 47 YEARS,
R/O BEDASHETTAHALLI VILLAGE,
MASTHI HOBLI,
MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
22. SRI ANAND
S/O PAPANNA,
AGED 39 YEARS,
R/O HULADENAHALLI VILLAGE,
MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
23. SRI.RAGHAVENDRA
S/O VENKATACHALAYYA,
AGED 42 YEARS,
R/O CHIKKA THIRUPATHI VILLAGE,
LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
-5-
NC: 2025:KHC:26122
CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025
HC-KAR
24. SRI.SRINIVAS A
S/O ASWATHAPPA,
AGED 41 YEARS,
R/O THIPPASANDRA VILLAGE,
MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
25. SRI PAPI REDDY @ CABLE PAPI REDDY
S/O NAGAREDDY,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/O DODDA SHIVARA VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
26. SRI MUGAPPA
S/O LATE MUNIGURAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/O PURASANAHALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
27. SRI CHETHAN
S/O VENKATESHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.
R/O MASTHI VILLAGE AND HOBLI,
MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
28. SRI KUMAR @ ASHOK KUMAR
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
R/O KURANDALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
29. SRI LOKESH
S/O LATE CHINNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/O THONDAVADI VILLAGE,
MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
-6-
NC: 2025:KHC:26122
CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025
HC-KAR
30. SMT MAMATHA
W/O VJAYENDRA,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
R/O THONDAVADI VILLAGE,
MALUR TALUK.KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
31. SRI VASANTHA KUMAR D T @ DODDA VASANTHA
S/O. THANAPPA,AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
R/O DN DODDI VILLAGE
MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
32. SRI NAVEEN
S/O. ANJINAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
R/O NAGAURA VILLAGE,
LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
33. SRI ASHWATHA REDDY
S/O APPANNA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/O ERABANAHALI VILLAGE,
MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
34. SRI VIJAYA NARASIMHA
S/O T MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/O 3RD BLOCK MASTHI,
BRAHMINS STREET
MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
35. SRI LOKESH, S/O. TYNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
R/O DN DODDI VILLAGE,
LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
36. SRI. MUNIRAJU
S/O. VENKATARAMANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/O. VAPPACHALLI VILLAGE,
-7-
NC: 2025:KHC:26122
CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025
HC-KAR
LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
37. SRI. HARISH
S/O. MUNI GANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
R/O. CHIKKA IGGALURU VILLAGE,
LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139.
38. SRI. RAVI KUMAR
S/O. LATE KRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/O. KADANAHALLI VILLAGE,
MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
39. SRI. SRINIVASA B D
S/O. DODDATHIPPANNA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.
R/O. BITNAHALLI VILLAGE,
MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563139.
40. HEMA @ HEMAVATHI
W/O TPS MUNIRAJU AGED 47 YEARS R/O
SAMPANGERE VILLAGE
LAKKUR HOBLI MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT -563139
41. SRI M VENKATAESH
S/O C T MUNIYAPPA AGED 47 YEARS R/O
CHOKKANDAHALLI VILLAGE
MALUR TALUK,KOLAR DISTRICT - 563139
42. SRI MUNIRAJU
S/O VENAKATASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
R/AT AROHALLI VILLAGE
MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT 563139
43. SRI S N VENAKATESH
S/O VENKATASWAMY AGED 37 YEARS R/O
-8-
NC: 2025:KHC:26122
CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025
HC-KAR
DYAPASANDRA VILLAGE
MALUR TALUK,KOLAR DISTRICT -563139
44. SRI MALLESH
S/O VENKATASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
R/O GANDHI CIRCLE
MALUR TOWN MALUR TQ
KOLAR DISTRICT -563139
45. SRI NAVEEN
S/O SHANKARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
R/O THALKUNTE VILLAGE
LAKKUR HOBLI MALUR
MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT 563139
46. SRI MADHUSUDHAN
S/O GOPAL KRISHNA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/O PATALAMMA TEMPLE STREET
GANDHI CIRCLE , MALUR TOWN MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT 563139
47. SURESH BABU
S/O NARAYANASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/O LAKKUR VILLAGE AND HOBLI MALUR
MALUR TALUK , KOLAR DISTRICT 563139
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SHREERAM TIMMAPPA NAYAK.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY MALUR POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY THE HCGP,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
-9-
NC: 2025:KHC:26122
CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025
HC-KAR
2. MR K S ANJINAPPA PSI
(L AND O) AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS POLICE SUB
INSPECTOR MALUR POLICE STATION MARUTHI
EXTENSION MALUR -563130
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B.N. JAGADEESH ADDL.SPP A/W
SRI CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HGCP)
CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) BY
THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS
HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR
IN CRIME NO.155/2020 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE
AND IMPUGNED CHARGE SHEET REGISTERED IN
CONNECTION THEREOF AND THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
IN CC NO.2274/2024 REGISTERED AGAINST THE
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED FOR OFFENCES P/U/S 143, 147, 149,
268, 269, 286 AND 253 OF THE IPC, 1860 PENDING ON THE
FILE OF THE HONBLE II ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
KOLAR DISTRICT AT MALUR.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, the petitioners seeks the following reliefs:
"WHEREFORE, the Petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased in the interest of justice to quash the FIR in Crime No.155 of 2020 by the Respondent No.1 Police and impugned charge sheet registered in connection thereof and the criminal
- 10 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR proceedings in C.C.No.2274 of 2024 registered against the Petitioners/Accused for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147,, 149, 188, 268, 269, 283 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Annexure-E) pending on the file of the Hon'ble II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kolar District at Malur, and Grant such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of this case.."
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners-accused and learned HCGP for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue in controversy involved in the present petition is directly and squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Mr. Lakshminarayana @ Lachhi Vs. The State of Karnataka and another - Crl.P.No.5950/2025 dated 12.06.2025 (arising out of C.C.No.2294/2024), since the said Lakshminarayana @ Lachhi.
is accused No.36 and the present petitioners are accused Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,20,21,22,23,25,26, 28,29,30,32,32,34,35,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,
- 11 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR 51 and 52, in C.C.No.2274/2024 pending before the Trial Court and by way of parity the present petition may be allowed and disposed of in the above terms.
4. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners, while the petitioners-accused, are accused Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,20,21,22,23,25,26, 28,29,30,32,32,34,35,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50, 51 and 52 in C.C.No.2274/2024, this Court in relation to accused No.36- Lakshminarayana @ Lachhi., in Crl.P.No.5950/2025 vide order dated 12.06.2025 and allowed the petition as under:
"In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
"A. QUASH the impugned charge sheet filed by the Respondent No.1 Police against the Petitioner/Accused No.36 for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 149, 188, 268, 269, 283 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Annexure-E) pending before the Hon'ble II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kolar District at Malur;
- 12 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR B. QUASH the Complaint dated 14.07.2020 (Annexure-A), the FIR dated 14.07.2020 registered in Crime No.155 of 2020 by the Respondent No.1 Police (Annexure-B) and Supplementary Complaint dated 16.07.2020 (Annexure-C) as against the Petitioner herein for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 188, 269, 149,283, 268 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1960.
C. Quash the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.2274 of 2024 registered against the Petitioner/Accused No.36 for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 149, 188, 268, 269, 283 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 pending on the file of the Hon'ble II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kolar District at Malur.
D. Grant such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of this case."
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for respondent No.2 and perused the material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a perusal of the material on record comprising of the complaint, FIR etc., will indicate that the petitioner was not arraigned as accused. However, the petitioner has been
- 13 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR arraigned as accused in the charge sheet, which is currently pending in C.C.No.2294/2024 before the Trial Court, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 188, 268, 269, 283 and 353 of IPC. It is submitted that in the absence of any material on record to incriminate the petitioner for the alleged offences, the impugned proceedings deserves to be quashed in the light of the provisions enunciated by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the cases of D.K. Shivakumar Vs. State of Karnataka and another - Crl.P.No.3328/2023 dated 16.06.2023 and Mr. Sharanu Salagar Vs. State of Karnataka and another - Crl.P.No.6495/2023 dated 24.08.2023 at Annexures-G and H, respectively, insofar as the petitioner in this petition is concerned.
4. Per contra, learned HCGP for the respondent submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed.
5. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is an undisputed fact borne out from the material on record that the petitioner is not arraigned as accused in
- 14 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR the complaint and FIR and subsequently, he has been arraigned as accused No.36 in the impugned charge sheet, without there being any material on record against the petitioner in this regard. It is also relevant to state that in the case of D.K. Shiva Kumar (supra) (Annexure-G), a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court has held as under:
"The petitioner is before this Court calling in question registration of crime in Crime No.3 of 2022 for offences punishable under Section 5(3A) of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act, 2020 r/w. Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short), as also the charge sheet filed by the Police on 03-02-2022 in C.C.No.1663 of 2022 before the I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) & JMFC, Kanakapura for the aforesaid offences.
2. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:-
The petitioner is the President of the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee. A complaint comes to be registered by the Child Development and Protection Officer, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District on 12-01-2022 alleging that the petitioner / President had organized a rally pertaining to Mekedatu issue and on 10-01-2022 between 11.30 a.m. and 12.30 p.m. visited Vishwodaya High School located in Krishnayyana Doddi Grama, Kanakapura Taluk.
During the visit to the school, accused No.2, Head Master of the School in order to enable the children of the school to
- 15 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR take a picture with the petitioner pulled out the children from classes and brought them out to the open premises. On this allegation the complaint is registered contending that at the time when the said incident happened Standard Operating Procedure was in place and the action of the petitioner and accused No.2 was in violation of Section 5(3A) of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act and Section 75 of the Act. The complaint becomes a crime in Crime No.3 of 2022. The Police conduct investigation and in a month's time, file a charge sheet before the concerned Court in C.C.No.1663 of 2022. The learned Magistrate takes cognizance of the offences on 02-07-2022 and issues summons to both the accused. The receipt of summons after taking of cognizance is what drives the petitioner to this Court in the subject petition.
3. Heard Sri Arnav A.Bagalwadi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Mahesh Shetty, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend with vehemence that there is no substance in the allegation as the petitioner had not violated any provision of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act as there is no notification issued under the said Act depicting a Standard Operating Procedure. Insofar as offences under the Act, the learned counsel would submit that Section 75 of the Act would become applicable only if the children are in the care and protection of the petitioner. Since neither of the offences
- 16 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR can be laid against the petitioner, he seeks quashment of the entire proceedings.
5. Per contra, the learned High Court Government Pleader representing the State would refute the submissions to contend that the petitioner has violated the procedure and, therefore, it is a matter of trial for him to come out clean. But, he would admit the fact that in terms of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act, no notification is issued by the State invoking the said Act.
6. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the respective learned counsel and have perused the material on record.
7. The issue lies in a narrow compass. What triggers registration of the crime is a rally that was held by the Congress party, the President of which is the petitioner. On 10-01-2022, when the rally was in its motion, the President i.e., the petitioner between 11.30 a.m. and 12.30 p.m. visits Vishwodaya High School. The children of the school came out of their classes and posed for a picture with the President. This incident becomes a crime in Crime No.3 of 2022 for the afore-quoted offences. What is alleged against the petitioner is, violation of the provisions of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act and Section 75 of the Act. The violation is in particular to Section 5(3A) of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act and Section 75 of the Act. Therefore, it becomes germane to notice those provisions of law. Section 5 of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act reads as follows:
- 17 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR "5. Prohibition of Contravention or obstruction of Public Servant.--(1) No person, institution or company shall contravene or disobey any of the provisions of Section 4, rules, regulation or order made under this Act.
(2) No person shall obstruct any officer or any public servant while acting or purporting to act or discharging any duty in pursuance to any provisions of this Act, rules, regulations or orders made there under.
(3) No person shall indulge in any act of violence against a public servant or cause any damage or loss to any public or private property during an epidemic.
(3-A) whoever contravenes the provisions of sub-section (1) shall be punished with such fine as may be prescribed in rules or in regulations, which may extend to fifty thousand rupees or with imprisonment for a term which may extend up to three months or with both.
(4) Whoever contravenes any of the provisions of sub-section (2) or (3) shall on conviction be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three months, but which may extend to five years and with fine, which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees, but which may extend to two lakh rupees.
(5) Whoever, while committing an act of violence against a public servant, causes grievous hurt as defined in Section 320 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act 45 of 1860) to such person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months, but which may extend to seven years and with fine, which shall not be less than one lakh rupees, but which may extend to five lakh rupees."
(Emphasis supplied)
- 18 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR Section 5(3A) mandates that whoever contravenes sub- section (1) shall be punished in terms of sub-section (3A). Sub-section (1) concerns that any person, institution or company contravening or disobeying any provisions of Section 4, Rules or Regulations made under the Act would become an offence and the offence would become punishable under sub-section (3A).
8. Therefore, it becomes germane to notice Section 4 of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act as the contravention of Section 4 would result in an offence under Section 5. Section 4 of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act reads as follows:
"4. Power to take special measures and specify regulations as to epidemic disease.--(1) When at any time the Government is satisfied that the State or any part thereof is visited by or threatened with an outbreak of any epidemic disease, the Government may take such measures, as it deems necessary for the purpose, by notification in the Official Gazette specify such temporary regulations or orders to be observed by the public or by any person or class of persons so as to prevent the outbreak of such disease or the spread thereof and require or empower Deputy Commissioner and/or Municipal Commissioners to exercise such powers and duties as may be specified in the said regulations or orders.
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions, the Government may take measures and specify regulations,--
(a) to prohibit any usage or act which the Government considers sufficient to spread or transmit epidemic diseases from person to person in any gathering,
- 19 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR celebration, worship or other such activities within the State;
(b) to inspect the persons entering the State by air, rail, road, sea or any other means or in quarantine or in isolation, in hospital, temporary accommodation, home or otherwise of persons suspected of being infected with any such disease by the officers authorized in the regulation or orders;
(c) to seal State or district borders for such period as may be deemed necessary;
(d) to impose restrictions on the operation of public and private transport;
(e) to prescribe social distancing norms;
(f) to restrict or prohibit congregation of persons in public places and religious institutions;
(g) to regulate or restrict the functioning of offices, Government and Private and educational institutions in the State;
(h) to impose prohibition or restrictions on the functioning of shops and commercial establishments, factories, workshops and godowns;
(i) to restrict duration of services in essential or emergency services such as banks, media, health care, food supply, electricity, water, fuel, etc.,;
(j) to restrict social, political, sports, entertainment, academic, cultural or religious functions or gatherings; and
(k) such other measures as may be necessary for the regulation and prevention of epidemic diseases as decided by the Government."
Section 4 mandates that in order to take special measures and specify regulations as to epidemic disease, the Government by a notification in the Official Gazette specify
- 20 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR such temporary regulations or orders to be observed by the public or by any person or class of persons so as to prevent the outbreak of such disease. Therefore, the fulcrum of Section 4 is issuance of a notification in the Official Gazette notifying temporary regulations or orders. It is after such notification under Section 4, if a person contravenes or disobeys those Regulations so notified, it would become an offence under Section 5 for contravention of Regulations notified under Section 4.
9. It is admitted fact that no notification is issued by the State Government under Section 4 of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act. If there is no notification issued under Section 4, an offence under Section 5 cannot be laid against any person as there is no regulation that a person would contravene as contravention of the Regulations cannot be imaginary. Therefore, the very offence alleged against the petitioner was fundamentally flawed.
10. The other offence alleged is under Section 75 of the Act. Section 75 of the Act reads as follows:
"75. Punishment for cruelty to child.-- Whoever, having the actual charge of, or control over, a child, assaults, abandons, abuses, exposes or wilfully neglects the child or causes or procures the child to be assaulted, abandoned, abused, exposed or neglected in a manner likely to cause such child unnecessary mental or physical suffering, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine of one lakh rupees or with both:
Provided that in case it is found that such abandonment of the child by the biological parents is
- 21 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR due to circumstances beyond their control, it shall be presumed that such abandonment is not wilful and the penal provisions of this section shall not apply in such cases:
Provided further that if such offence is committed by any person employed by or managing an organisation, which is entrusted with the care and protection of the child, he shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment which may extend up to five years, and fine which may extend up to five lakhs rupees:
Provided also that on account of the aforesaid cruelty, if the child is physically incapacitated or develops a mental illness or is rendered mentally unfit to perform regular tasks or has risk to life or limb, such person shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment, not less than three years but which may be extended up to ten years and shall also be liable to fine of five lakhs rupees."
Section 75 makes it an offence if the person who is in- charge of the child or has control over the child assaults, abandons, abuses, exposes or willfully neglects the child or causes or procures the child to be assaulted, abandoned, abused, exposed or neglected in a manner likely to cause the child unnecessary mental or physical suffering shall become punishable for a term which may extend upto 3 years.
11. The fact that leads to the said allegation is that, the petitioner posed for a picture with the children at Vishwodaya High School, Kanakapura Taluk. The children were neither under the care or protection of the petitioner nor was he in-charge of the children. The children come out of the classes for the picture and the matter ends there. The petitioner did not have any control or in-charge over the
- 22 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR children. The very offence is loosely laid against the petitioner, much less to say he is alleged of assault, abandoning, abusing or exposing or neglecting the children. The aforesaid facts cannot even lead to the alleged offences against the petitioner.
12. The Police have also filed a charge sheet in the matter alleging that Government has notified a Standard Operating Procedure during Covid-19 on 04-01-2022, and therefore, there has been violation of the provisions of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act, 2020. The very summary of the charge sheet clearly indicates that it is laid on imaginary lines. A trivial act which does not contain any of the ingredients of the afore-quoted offences, is laid against the petitioner. A perusal at the summary of the charge sheet would indicate the reason behind filing of the charge sheet. The summary insofar as such indication reads as follows:
"PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ PÉÆëqï-19 ¸ÁAPÁæ«ÄPÀ gÉÆÃUÀ ºÀgÀqÀĪÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÀUl À ÄÖªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀÝ RD/158/TNR/2020 Date 04/01/2022 PÉÆëqï-19 ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ£ÀÄß G®èAX¹, ªÀÄPÀ̼ÄÀ UÀ½AzÀ "£ÀªÄÀ ä ¤ÃgÀÄ, £ÀªÀÄä ºÀPÀÄÌ" JA§ WÉÆõÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀÆV¹, ªÀÄPÀ̼À£ÄÀ ß gÁdQÃAiÀĪÁV ¥ÉæÃgɦvÀUÉƼÀÄîªÀAvÉ ªÀiÁr, ¸ÀPÁðj ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀĪÀ RD/158/TNR/2020 Date 04/01/2022 PÉÆëqï-19 ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaAiÀÄ£ÀÄß G®èAX¹gÀĪÀÅzÀÄ vÀ¤SɬÄAzÀ zÀÈqsÀ¥n À ÖgÀÄvÀÛzÉ."
The petitioner appears to have made the children to eco with him "£ÀªÀÄä ¤ÃgÀÄ, £ÀªÄÀ ä ºÀPÄÀ Ì". This is said to be politically influencing the children of the High School who are below 15 years of age. Therefore, none of the allegations made against the petitioner are even present in the case at hand and if only for the reason that charge sheet is filed against
- 23 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR the petitioner, further proceedings are permitted to continue it would become an abuse of the process of law and result in miscarriage of justice.
13. For the aforesaid reasons, I pass the following:
ORDER
(i) Criminal petition is allowed.
(ii) FIR in Crime No.3 of 2022 dated 12-01-2022 registered by the Sathanoor Police Station and Charge Sheet filed in C.C.No.1663 of 2022 pending before the I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) & JMFC, Kanakapura, Ramanagara District stand quashed.
(iii) It is made clear that the observations made in the course of the order are only for the purpose of consideration of the case of the petitioner under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and the same shall not bind or influence the proceedings against the other accused pending before the concerned Court."
6. In the case of Mr. Sharanu Salagar (supra) (Annexure-H), this court has held as under:
"1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
- 24 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR
(i) Quash the final report as against the petitioner / accused No.1 filed by the respondent Police in Crime No.11 of 2022 registered by respondent No.1 registered for offences under Sections 269 & 271 of the IPC, 1860 and Section 5(3A) of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act, 2020 before the learned Civil Judge & JMFC, Basavakalyan as per Annexure-D.
(ii) Quash the FIR in Crime No.11 of 2022 as against the petitioner / accused No.1 for the offences punishable under SEctiosn 269 & 271 of the IPC, 1860 and Section 5(3A) of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act, 2020 filed by respondent No.1 Police as per Annexure-A, pending before the 42nd ACMM Court, Bengaluru.
(iii) Quash the proceedings in C.C. No.8434 of 2023 against the petitioner / accused No.1 registered for the offenses punishable under Section 269 & 271 of the IPC, 1860 and Section 5(3A) of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act, 2020 pending before the learned 42nd ACMM (Special Court constituted for adjudication of offences registered against MLAs & MPs).
(iv) Pass such other relief as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant on the facts and circumstances of the case.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue in the lis stands covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Crl.P.No.3328/2023, dated 16.6.2023, wherein this Court has held as follows:
"The petitioner is before this Court calling in question registration of crime in Crime No.3 of 2022 for offences punishable under Section 5(3A) of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act, 2020 r/w. Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short), as also the charge sheet filed by the Police on 03-02-2022 in C.C.No.1663 of 2022 before the I Additional Civil Judge(Junior Division) & JMFC, Kanakapura for the aforesaid offences.
- 25 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR
2. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:-
The petitioner is the President of the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee. A complaint comes to be registered by the Child Development and Protection Officer, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District on 12-01- 2022 alleging that the petitioner / President had organized a rally pertaining to Mekedatu issue and on 10-01-2022 between 11.30 a.m. and 12.30 p.m. visited Vishwodaya High School located in Krishnayyana Doddi Grama, Kanakapura Taluk. During the visit to the school, accused No.2, Head Master of the School in order to enable the children of the school to take a picture with the petitioner pulled out the children from classes and brought them out to the open premises. On this allegation the complaint is registered contending that at the time when the said incident happened Standard Operating Procedure was in place and the action of the petitioner and accused No.2 was in violation of Section 5(3A) of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act and Section 75 of the Act. The complaint becomes a crime in Crime No.3 of 2022. The Police conduct investigation and in a month's time, file a charge sheet before the concerned Court in C.C.No.1663 of 2022. The learned Magistrate takes cognizance of the offences on 02-07-2022 and issues summons to both the accused. The receipt of summons after taking of cognizance is what drives the petitioner to this Court in the subject petition.
3. Heard Sri Arnav A.Bagalwadi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Mahesh Shetty, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend with vehemence that there is no substance in the allegation as the petitioner had not violated any provision of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act as there is no notification issued under the said Act depicting a Standard Operating Procedure. Insofar as offences under the Act, the learned counsel would submit that Section 75 of the Act would become applicable only if the children are in the care and protection of the petitioner. Since neither of the offences can be laid against the petitioner, he seeks quashment of the entire proceedings.
5. Per contra, the learned High Court Government Pleader representing the State would refute the
- 26 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR submissions to contend that the petitioner has violated the procedure and, therefore, it is a matter of trial for him to come out clean. But, he would admit the fact that in terms of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act, no notification is issued by the State invoking the said Act.
6. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the respective learned counsel and have perused the material on record.
7. The issue lies in a narrow compass. What triggers registration of the crime is a rally that was held by the Congress party, the President of which is the petitioner. On 10-01-2022, when the rally was in its motion, the President i.e., the petitioner between 11.30 a.m. and 12.30 p.m. visits Vishwodaya High School. The children of the school came out of their classes and posed for a picture with the President. This incident becomes a crime in Crime No.3 of 2022 for the afore- quoted offences. What is alleged against the petitioner is, violation of the provisions of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act and Section 75 of the Act. The violation is in particular to Section 5(3A) of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act and Section 75 of the Act. Therefore, it becomes germane to notice those provisions of law. Section 5 of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act reads as follows:
"5. Prohibition of Contravention or obstruction of Public Servant:-- (1) No person, institution or company shall contravene or disobey any of the provisions of Section 4, rules, regulation or order made under this Act.
(2) No person shall obstruct any officer or any public servant while acting or purporting to act or discharging any duty in pursuance to any provisions of this Act, rules, regulations or orders made there under.
(3) No person shall indulge in any act of violence against a public servant or cause any damage or loss to any public or private property during an epidemic.
(3-A) whoever contravenes the provisions of sub- section (1) shall be punished with such fine as may be prescribed in rules or in regulations, which may extend to fifty thousand rupees or with imprisonment for a term which may extend up to three months or with both.
- 27 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR (4) Whoever contravenes any of the provisions of sub-section (2) or (3) shall on conviction be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three months, but which may extend to five years and with fine, which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees, but which may extend to two lakh rupees.
(5) Whoever, while committing an act of violence against a public servant, causes grievous hurt as defined in Section 320 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act 45 of 1860) to such person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months, but which may extend to seven years and with fine, which shall not be less than one lakh rupees, but which may extend to five lakh rupees."
(Emphasis supplied) Section 5(3A) mandates that whoever contravenes sub-section (1) shall be punished in terms of sub-section (3A). Sub-section (1) concerns that any person, institution or company contravening or disobeying any provisions of Section 4, Rules or Regulations made under the Act would become an offence and the offence would become punishable under sub-section (3A).
8. Therefore, it becomes germane to noticeSection 4 of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act as the contravention of Section 4 would result in an offence under Section 5. Section 4 of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act reads as follows:
"4. Power to take special measures and specify regulations as to epidemic disease.--(1) When at any time the Government is satisfied that the State or any part thereof is visited by or threatened with an outbreak of any epidemic disease, the Government may take such measures, as it deems necessary for the purpose, by notification in the Official Gazette specify such temporary regulations or orders to be observed by the public or by any person or class of persons so as to prevent the outbreak of such disease or the spread thereof and require or empower Deputy Commissioner and/or Municipal Commissioners to exercise such powers and duties as may be specified in the said regulations or orders.
- 28 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR (2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions, the Government may take measures and specify regulations,--
(a) to prohibit any usage or act which the Government considers sufficient to spread or transmit epidemic diseases from person to person in any gathering, celebration, worship or other such activities within the State;
(b) to inspect the persons entering the State by air, rail, road, sea or any other means or in quarantine or in isolation, in hospital, temporary accommodation, home or otherwise of persons suspected of being infected with any such disease by the officers authorized in the regulation or orders;
(c) to seal State or district borders for such period as may be deemed necessary;
(d) to impose restrictions on the operation of public and private transport;
(e) to prescribe social distancing norms;
(f) to restrict or prohibit congregation of persons in public places and religious institutions;
(g) to regulate or restrict the functioning of offices, Government and Private and educational institutions in the State;
(h) to impose prohibition or restrictions on the functioning of shops and commercial establishments, factories, workshops and godowns;
(i) to restrict duration of services in essential or emergency services such as banks, media, health care, food supply, electricity, water, fuel, etc.,;
(j) to restrict social, political, sports, entertainment, academic, cultural or religious functions or gatherings; and
(k) such other measures as may be necessary for the regulation and prevention of epidemic diseases as decided by the Government."
Section 4 mandates that in order to take special measures and specify regulations as to epidemic disease, the Government by a notification in the Official Gazette specify such temporary regulations or orders to be
- 29 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR observed by the public or by any person or class of persons so as to prevent the outbreak of such disease. Therefore, the fulcrum of Section 4 is issuance of a notification in the Official Gazette notifying temporary regulations or orders. It is after such notification under Section 4, if a person contravenes or disobeys those Regulations so notified, it would become an offence under Section 5 for contravention of Regulations notified under Section 4.
9. It is admitted fact that no notification is issued by the State Government under Section 4 of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act. If there is no notification issued under Section 4, an offence under Section 5 cannot be laid against any person as there is no regulation that a person would contravene as contravention of the Regulations cannot be imaginary. Therefore, the very offence alleged against the petitioner was fundamentally flawed."
3. This Court in the aforesaid judgment held as follows:
4. In the light of the issue standing covered by the Judgment of this Court, the petition deserves to be succeed. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:
ORDER
(i) The petition is allowed.
(ii) The proceedings in C.C. No.8434 of 2023 against the petitioner / accused No.1 registered for the offenses punishable under Section 269 & 271 of the IPC, 1860 and Section 5(3A) of the Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act, 2020 pending before the learned 42nd ACMM (Special Court constituted for adjudication of
- 30 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR offences registered against MLAs & MPs), stands quashed."
7. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the judgment of this Court referred to supra and in the absence of any material on record either in the FIR, complaint, statement of witnesses, documents etc., so as to incriminate the petitioner for the alleged offences, I am of the considered opinion that continuation of the proceedings against the petitioner would amount to abuse of process of law and the same deserves to be quashed.
8. In the result, I pass the following:
ORDER
i) The petition is allowed.
ii) The impugned criminal proceedings in C.C.No.2274/2024 (arising out of FIR in crime No.155/2020 registered by respondent No.1-Police), pending on the file of the II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Malur, Kolar District, insofar as the petitioner is concerned, are hereby quashed."
5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and by applying Doctrine of Parity, the arrest of the petitioners-accused herein in C.C.No.2274/2024 deserves to be quashed in terms of
- 31 -
NC: 2025:KHC:26122 CRL.P No. 9615 of 2025 HC-KAR the order passed by this Court in the case of Lakshminarayana @ Lachhi., in Crl.P.No.5950/2025 vide order dated 12.06.2025.
6. Accordingly, I pass the following:
ORDER
i) The petition is allowed.
ii) The impugned criminal proceedings in C.C.No.2274/2024 (arising out of FIR in crime No.155/2020 registered by respondent No.1-
Police), pending on the file of the II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Malur, Kolar District, insofar as the petitioners-accused herein are concerned, is hereby quashed.
Sd/-
(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE HR