Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Smt. Champa Rajaram Bhosale vs Bal Sanskar Kendra Through President ... on 12 March, 2020

Author: Prithviraj K. Chavan

Bench: R. K. Deshpande, Prithviraj K. Chavan

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  WRIT    PETITION      NO.    4579      OF   2016

                      Smt. Champa Rajaram Bhosale.                    ..Petitioner.
                             Versus
                      Bal Sanskar Kendra and Others.                  ..Respondents.

                      Mr. I. M. Khairdi for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Sharad T. Bhosale for Respondent No. 1.
                      Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5.

                                                     Coram : R. K. DESHPANDE, &
                                                             PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.

Date : March 12, 2020.

P. C. :

1. By the order dated 15th July 2015, the Petitioner was promoted as head-mistress and transferred from Boroti to Lamboti in the ashram school. Earlier, she was working in the ashram school run by the Social Welfare Department, whereas on transfer, she was made to work in the ashram school run by the Integrated Tribal Development Department.
2. The transfer was objected to by the Tribal Development Department on the ground that the permission as required by Rule 16 of the Ashram School Code was not obtained.

Therefore, transfer was not approved. As a result, the Petitioner could not get salary from the month of October 2015. We do not Digitally signed by Sachin Sachin R. R. Patil Date:

patilsr 1/ 2

Patil    2020.03.20
         13:30:52
         +0530

find any infirmity in the action taken by the Tribal Development Department. However, the Petitioner has already worked on the post from 15th July 2015 to 31st March 2017, when she attained the age of superannuation. The Petitioner, therefore, would be entitled to receive salary for this period from the management. In view of this, writ petition is allowed. The management is directed to pay arrears of salary to the Petitioner for the period 15th July 2015 to 31st March 2017 within a period of 12 weeks from today. Accordingly, pension papers of the Petitioner shall be submitted to the competent authority. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [R. K. DESHPANDE, J.] patilsr 2/ 2