Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Shri Pandharinath Vithal Satare on 17 June, 2011

  
 
 
 
 
 
 DRAFT :- MA/11/8 (A/11/18)  KH + DK
  
 
 
 
 
 







 



 

   

 
   
   
   


   
     
     
     

BEFORE THE
    HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 
    
   
    
     
     

COMMISSION,  MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
    
   
  
  
   

 
  
 
  
   
   

 
  
 
  
   
   
     
     
     
       
       
       

Miscellaneous
      Application No. MA/11/8 IN a/11/18
      
     
    
     

 
    
   
    
     
     

 
    
   
    
     
     
       
       
       
         
         
         

1.

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD PANVEL BRANCH OFFICE POOJYA SINDHI PANCHAYAT BUILDING PANVEL TALUKA PANVEL RAIGAD MAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s) Versus

1. SHRI PANDHARINATH VITHAL SATARE R/AT GURUDUTTA PRAGATI CHAWL ROOM NO 57, THANE BELAPUR ROAD BELAPUR THANE MAHARASHTRA ...........Respondent(s)   BEFORE:

   
Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode PRESIDING MEMBER   Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar Member   PRESENT:
Adv. D.R.Mahadik for the appellant present Adv.Uday Wavikar for the respondent present       ORDER :- ( Per Mr.S.R.Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member)   (1) Heard both the parties. There is delay of 48 days for which this application is filed.

This application relevantly opposed by the respondent. The delay is sought to be explained as per the Para 2 of the application, which chronologically explained the events contributing to the delay. Certified copy of the order passed by the Forum below was received by the appellant on 04/10/2010. The delay is neither intentional nor malafied. In absence of any   evidence in rebuttal, we find it proper to accept the version given by the applicant/appellant.

 

(2) Under the circumstances, we find the delay is satisfactorily explained and it will be just and proper if the application for condonation of delay is allowed subject to costs. Hence, we hold accordingly and pass the following order.

 

ORDER   (1)  Application of delay condonation is allowed subject to costs of ` 1,000/- which appellant shall pay within 30 days from today by failing which the application shall automatically be dismissed.

 

(2)  Subject to Payment of costs ` 1,000/-, appeal is adjourned to 18/07/2011.

   

Pronounced on dated 17th June, 2011.

[Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode] PRESIDING MEMBER       [Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar] Member   Pgg.