Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

M/S Trb Infratech Pvt. Ltd vs Ut Of J&K & Anr on 5 December, 2025

Author: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Bench: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

                                                                      Sr. No. 147

      HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                       AT JAMMU

WP(C) No.3451/2025

M/s TRB Infratech Pvt. Ltd.                            .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)

                                 Through :- Mr. Amit Gupta, Sr. Advocate with
                                            Mr. Sumit Moza, Advocate.
                         v/s
UT of J&K & Anr.                                                  .....Respondent(s)

                                 Through :- Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG.


CORAM:      HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE

                                   ORDER

05.12.2025

01. By this petition, petitioner herein has challenged letter dated 15.11.2025 addressed to the petitioner, whereby respondent No.2 has kept in abeyance, till further orders, the allotment and Letter of Acceptance (LoA), with respect to the e-NIT No.15 of 2025-26 dated 28.08.2025, for construction of 160 metres(4x40) span double lane pre-stressed concrete girder motorable bridge over Rajouri Tawi, Panjpeer Badla Mang at Rajouri with approaches.

02. It is stated that the Letter of Acceptance had been issued in favour of the petitioner, agreement was executed and the bank guarantee had also been taken by the respondents in respect e-NIT in question, yet the LoA as well as allotment has been kept in abeyance, without any reasonable justification.

03. Notice.

2

04. Mr. Ravinder Gupta, learned AAG waives notice on behalf of the respondents. He seeks and is granted two weeks' time to file reply with an advance copy to the other side.

05. List on 23.12.2025.

06. Meanwhile, subject to objections from the other side and till next date of hearing, the respondents are directed not to re-tender the work which has already been allotted in favour of the petitioner.

(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge JAMMU 05.12.2025 Eva