Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

State Of Gujarat vs G M Chemicals....Opponent(S) on 8 January, 2014

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi, Sonia Gokani

        O/TAXAP/1168/2013                                ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       TAX APPEAL NO. 1168 of 2013
                                   With
                    CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 759 of 2013
                                     In
                       TAX APPEAL NO. 1168 of 2013
================================================================
                      STATE OF GUJARAT....Appellant(s)
                                 Versus
                       G M CHEMICALS....Opponent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR JAIMIN GANDHI, LD.ASST.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Appellant(s)
No. 1
MR PV PATADIYA, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1
MR JAYESH C PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1
================================================================

      CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL
             KURESHI
             and
             HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA
             GOKANI

                             Date : 08/01/2014


                               ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

1. The   State   has   preferred   present   appeal  challenging   the   judgment   of   the   Gujarat   Value  Added   Tax   Tribunal   at   Ahmedabad   (hereinafter  referred   to   as   'the   Tribunal').   Following  questions   have   been   presented   for   our  Page 1 of 9 O/TAXAP/1168/2013 ORDER consideration :

"(1)  Whether in the light of above facts   and   circumstances   of   the   case,   the   Honourable   Tribunal   had   rightly   interpreted   entry 48 of Schedule­I and 51 of Schedule­II   of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003?
(2) Whether  on  the facts and  circumstances   of   the   case,   the   Honourable   Tribunal   had   rightly   hold   that   "Toxiwin­ES"   is   "Poultry  Feed" falling under Entry 48 of Sch.I ?"

2. Simply   put   the   issue   is   whether   the   product  manufactured   and   marketed   by   the   respondent­ assessee in the name of  "Toxiwin­ES"  would fall  under Entry 48 Schedule I as a "Poultry Feed" or  under   Entry   51   Schedule   II   as  "Minerals   and  Ores".

 

3. The   Department   holds   a   belief   that   since   the  mineral, namely, 'Zeolite' is the main ingredient  in the product in question, the same should fall  under Entry 51. The respondent­assessee, however,  contends   that   the   product   is   a   pure   and   simple  poultry   feed   and   even   though  'Zeolite'  is   the  basic ingredient; after putting the same through  Page 2 of 9 O/TAXAP/1168/2013 ORDER a complex and sophisticated process to refine it,  the   other   Feed   Additives   are   added   before   the  final product "Toxiwin­ES" comes into the market.

4. When the issue reached the Tribunal, the assessee  explained   the   process   of   manufacturing   the  product as under :

"8.1 The   material   popularity   known   as  Montmorillonite   or   Zeolite   is   collecting   from   mines   by   open   cast   mining.   The   said  mining   material   once   collected   is   to   be   spread in the open land for the purpose of  solar   dying   and   then   after   it   is   manually   purifying   by   picking   up   impurities.   Then  after   material   is   brought   the   factory   premises and again impurities are separated  by   using   screen   separator   or   vibrating   machine.   Pure   material   brought   to   grinding  department   for   pulverizing   in   roller   mill.  Then after said powdered material is fade to   the   Power   Separating   Machine   for   removing   heavy   particles   present   in   the   powder.   In   some cases other ingredients like Activated  Char­Coal,   Organic   Acids,   M.O.S.   (all   feed  additives) etc. are also mixed with Zeolite,   Toxin   Binder   using   blenders.   Finally   the  material is packed for marketing as per the   requirement of customers.
Page 3 of 9
     O/TAXAP/1168/2013                                ORDER




        8.2             The   Toxin   Binder   so   produced   is  
only for the animal feed grade and therefore   exclusively used as cattle, Poultry and aqua   feed supplements. The purpose of the use of  the   said   Toxin   Binder     is   to   bind   and   adsorption   of   present   mycotoxin   like  aflatoxin in live stocks and also works as a   hepato   protector,   growth   promoter   and   performance   booster   the   quality   and  production   efficiency   by   balancing   all   the  nutrients   required   for   obtaining   the  specific   function   from   the   animal   ensuring  the   production   capacity,   weight   gain   or  working capacity by supplying the additional   nutritional   value.   Toxin   Binder   is   used   as   regular feed to micro level in the daily use   and hence it is recognized as feed additives   as   the   preparation   is   made   to   provide   animals with   nutrient elements required to  ensure rational and balance daily diet."

5. The product is also marketed in the brand name of  "Toxin   Binder".   The   assessee   also   produced   a  certificate   of   Director   of   Animal   Husbandry,  Gujarat   State,   Gandhinagar,   which   certified   as  under :

"Hydrated   Sodium   Calcium   Alumino   silicate   Page 4 of 9 O/TAXAP/1168/2013 ORDER (HSCAS)­Mineral­Zeolite   (Sodium   Zeolite   A)­ Toxin Binder is an Animal Feeds Supplement."  

6. The   assessee   pointed   out   that   in   the   basic  ingredient   of   'Zeolite'  various   feed   additives,  such as Enzymes, Probiotics, Prebiotics, Dietary  Amino   Acids,   Toxin   Binders,   Minerals   and  Vitamins, Protein, Metabolic modifiers, etc. were  added.

7. It  was  on  the   basis  of  such  material  placed  on  record, the Tribunal held that the product would  fall under Entry 48 as a "Poultry Feed". In order  to   come   to   such   a   conclusion,   the   Tribunal  observed as under :

"Observations and Conclusions
44. The   Tribunal   has   considered   the   facts   and   circumstances   of   the   case   and   also   contention   of   the   appellant   as   well   as   contention   of   the   revenue   in   this   behalf.  The   Tribunal   has   also   considered   the  character of the commodity in question. The  Tribunal   has   also   considered   the   character   of the  commodity  in  question. The  usage  of   the   product   as   well   as   the   description   on   Page 5 of 9 O/TAXAP/1168/2013 ORDER the   label   which   have   been   produced   by   the   appellant   in   this   behalf.   The   necessary   certificates   are   also   produced   by   the   appellant.   According   to   the   Tribunal,   the   product   is   composition   of   organic   acids  namely   organic   acids   viz   propionic   acetic   benzoic   and   sorbic   acid,   specially   treated   HSCAS   (Hydrated   Sodium   Calcium   Aluminum   Solicate),   MOS   (Mannan   oligosaccharide)   and   oxine   copper.   The   broad   future   of   the   product   is   broad   spectrum   mold   inhibitor,   toxin binder and gut antibacterial.
45. The   Tribunal   is   of   the   view   that   the   Judgement   cited   by   the   appellant   i.e.   Judgement   of   the   Hon'ble   Supreme   Court   in  the case of Sun Export Corporation (Supra),  Judgement   of   Hon'ble   Gujarat   High   Court   in   the   case   of   Glaxo   Laboratories   (supra)   and   Judgement in the case of Glinder Ltd (Supra)   squarely apply to the facts of the case. The   Tribunal   has   also   considered   the   Judgement   of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in   the   case   of   State   of   Andhra   Pradesh   vs.   Tirumalagiri Traders reported at 73 STC 237  (AP) and State of Andhra Pradesh vs. J.K. &   Co   reported   at   890   STC   350   (AP)   are   also   applicable to the facts of the case.
46. In   Tribunal's   view,   the   goods   of   the   appellant   in   question   is   essential  Page 6 of 9 O/TAXAP/1168/2013 ORDER supplement of cattle feed, poultry feed and  aqua   feed   and   same   is   covered   entry   48   of   Schedule I of the VAT Act. The Tribunal has  also   considered   certificate   issued   by   the   Director   of   Animal   Husbandry.   The   Tribunal   has   considered   documents   required   to   be   furnished   while   asking   for   veterinary  certificate   about   HSCAS   used   for  manufacturing   toxin   binder   which   is   to   be  exported.   The   product   of   the   appellant   satisfies   the   said   standard.   The   Tribunal   has   also   considered   analysis   certificate   produced   by   the   appellant.   He   has   also   produced   detail   about   the   feed   additives   from the Indian Animal Feed Industry.
47. In   view   of   the   same,   the   Tribunal   has   gone   through   the   literature   about   the   feed   additives.   In   Tribunal's   view,   the   product   of   the   appellant   is   in   question   and   satisfies the criteria laid down by and held   that it is poultry falling under entry 48 of   Schedule   I   of   the   Act   not   Entry   51   of   the   Schedule II of the Act.
48. The   Tribunal   has   gone   through   the   judgement   cited   by   the   appellant   i.e.   case   of   Hon.Supreme   Court   in   Sun   Export   Corp.,  Hon.Gujarat High Court in Glaxo Laboratories   (India)   Ltd.   and   Judgement   of   Pfizer   Ltd. 

All these judgements support the say of the   Page 7 of 9 O/TAXAP/1168/2013 ORDER appellant."

8. In   view   of   the   materials   on   record   and   the  observations and conclusions of the Tribunal, we  see   no   infirmity   in   the   decision   when   the  Tribunal held that the product in question was a  'poultry feed' and would fall under Entry 48 of  Schedule   I.   It   may   be   that   one   of   the   main  ingredients   of   the   product   was   'Zeolite',   which  itself   was   an   ore.   Nevertheless,   many   processes  were   undertaken   before   the   final   product   comes  into existence and the same was prepared solely  for the purpose of using the same as animal feed.  This   is   clear   from   the   voluminous   record.   As  pointed out by the assessee, after extracting the  'Zeolite'  from the mines, the same is subjected  to detailed procedure for removing the impurities  and   separating   the   pure   material.   The   same   is  also   subjected   to   grinding   and   pulverizing   and  various   additives   such   as   Protein,   Minerals,  Vitamins, Amino acids, etc. are added. It is only  then   the   product   in   the   marketable   form   comes  into existence. Significantly, even the Director  of Animal Husbandry, Gujarat State, has certified  Page 8 of 9 O/TAXAP/1168/2013 ORDER that the same is an animal feed supplement. By no  stretch of imagination, it can be said that the  product   remained   in   original   form   of   'Zeolite',  which by itself is an ore. An attempt on the part  of the State to bring the product within Entry 51  as "Minerals and Ores" simply cannot be accepted.

9. In the result, the Tax Appeal is dismissed.

In view of disposal of the main appeal,  the  Civil Application  for stay does not survive  and the same stands disposed of accordingly.

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) Aakar Page 9 of 9