Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/2 vs The Grossner Evangelical Lutheran ... on 2 January, 2023

Author: Ajit Borthakur

Bench: Ajit Borthakur

                                                                 Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010196732017




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                              Case No. : RSA/168/2017

         SRI PAULUS SURIN and 3 ORS
         S/O LT. DAUD

         2: MANAGANG SURIN
          S/O SRI PAULUS SURIN

         3: SMT. ANEE SURIN

         4: SMT. LABANYA SURIN
          BOTH DAUGHTERS OF SRI PAULUS SURIN
         ALL ARE R/O MISSAMARI
          MOUZA 7 P.O. HALEM
          DIST. SONITPUR
         ASSAM

         VERSUS

         THE GROSSNER EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH and 2 ORS
         HALEM PARISH COUNCIL, P.O. and MOUZA HALEM, DIST. SONITPUR,
         ASSAM.

         2:REVEREND SAMUEL PURTI

          CHAIRMAN
          HALEM PARISH COUNCIL
          GROSSNER EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
          R/O MISSAMARI
          MOUZA and P.O. HALEM
          DIST. SONITPUR
          ASSAM.

         3:KALYAN PURTI
          S/O SRI ADAM PURTI
          SECY.
                                                                           Page No.# 2/2

           HALEM PARISH COUNCIL
           GROSSNER EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
           R/O DERING TEA ESTATE
           MOUZA BISWANATH CHARIALI
           DIST. SONITPUR
           ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A GANGULY
Advocate for the Respondent : MR.C CHAKRAVARTY


                                    BEFORE
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR

                                       ORDER

02.01.2023 Mr. A. Ganguly, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that as per instruction, the appellant No. 1 has expired, but, the date of his expiry is yet to be confirmed. The appellant Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are, of course, the son and daughters of the deceased appellant No. 1.

Mr. Ganguly seeks some time to obtain instruction.

Prayer is allowed.

LCR is not received. Issue reminder.

List after 4(four) weeks.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant