Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Bharatesh Agro Agency vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 January, 2025

Author: Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench: Hemant Chandangoudar

                                                                     -1-
                                                                                  NC: 2025:KHC-D:1378
                                                                               WP No. 104748 of 2024




                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                                                 DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025
                                                                  BEFORE
                                            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
                                                 WRIT PETITION NO.104748 OF 2024 (GM-RES)

                                        BETWEEN:

                                        BHARATESH AGRO AGENCY
                                        BY ITS PROPRIETOR,
                                        BHARATESH T. ROTTI,
                                        AGE. 31 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
                                        AT. POST. CHIKKODI ROAD,
                                        KABBUR, TQ. CHIKKODI, DIST. BELGAUM.
                                                                                        ...PETITIONER
                                        (BY SRI. SRINIVAS B. NAIK, ADVOCATE)

                                        AND:

                                        THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                                        REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                                        HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                        DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD,
                                        THROUGH AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
                                        CUM FERTILIZER INSPECTOR,
                                        RAITHA SAMPARKA KENDRA, NAGARMUNOLLI,
                Digitally signed by B
                K
                                        DIST. BELGAUM-591222.
BK
                MAHENDRAKUMAR
                Location: HIGH
                COURT OF
                                                                                      ...RESPONDENT
MAHENDRAKUMAR
                KARNATAKA
                DHARWAD BENCH
                Date: 2025.01.27
                16:35:19 +0530
                                        (BY SRI. T.HANUMAREDDY, ADDL. GOVT. ADVOCATE)

                                             THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
                                        227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING THIS HON'BLE
                                        COURT TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE
                                        PETITIONER/ACCUSED    NO.1    IN  CC  NO.118/2018,  VIDE
                                        ANNEXURE-B ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND
                                        JMFC, CHIKODI, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
                                        SECTION 3 AND 7 ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT, IN THE ENDS
                                        OF JUSTICE.

                                            THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
                                        ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                 -2-
                                             NC: 2025:KHC-D:1378
                                          WP No. 104748 of 2024




CORAM:     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

                          ORAL ORDER

The petitioner/accused No.1 is before this Court challenging cognizance taken for the offences punishable under Section 3 & 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

2. The second respondent lodged a private complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure alleging that sample fertilizer which was drawn from the shop of accused No.1 was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for analysis and the FSL submitted a report stating that the subject fertilizer is not as per the specification.

3. The petitioner/accused No.1 is the distributor of the subject fertilizer which was manufactured by Rohini Micronutrient Industries, a Company registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.

4. Accused No.2, who is working as a Technician of the aforesaid company which manufactured the subject fertilizer, had approached this Court in Crl.P. No.100343/2019 seeking to quash the very same criminal proceedings impugned in the present petition, and this Court, vide order dated 13.06.2022 quashed the proceedings insofar as it related to accused No.2 stating that the company having not been arraigned as an accused, accused No.2 cannot be held vicariously guilty as stated under Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act. Therefore, the present petition also -3- NC: 2025:KHC-D:1378 WP No. 104748 of 2024 deserves to be disposed of in terms of the order passed in the aforesaid petition. Hence, I pass the following:

ORDER
i) Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed.
ii) The criminal proceedings in C.C. No.118/2018 pending on the file of the Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Chikodi, insofar as it relates to petitioner/accused No.1, is hereby quashed.

Sd/-

(HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE KMS Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11