Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 1]

Madras High Court

Mp Shan Industries Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 9 January, 2015

Bench: Satish K. Agnihotri, M. Venugopal

       

  

   

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
										
DATED :  09.01.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL
							
W.P. Nos. 456 and 457 of 2015 and M.P. No.1 of 2015

MP Shan Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Represented by its Director
Sri P. Umasankar
No.33, Kongu Nagar Extn. I Street
Tiruppur 641 607				Petitioner in both the WPs
vs.

1	Union of India 
	represented by the Secretary to Government
	Ministry of Finance
	Department of Economic Affairs
	Room No.34-C
	New Delhi 110 001 - India

2	Reserve Bank of India
	represented by its Chairman
		and Managing Director
	6 Parliament Street
	New Delhi 110 001

3	The Authorised Officer
	Punjab National Bank
	BO: AGMO, Tirupur
	No.54, Sabari Street
	Tirupur 641 601			Respondents in both the WPs

Prayer in W.P. No.456 of 2015:
	Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of declaration declaring the provisions of Section 2(1)(o) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Act, 2002, as arbitrary, unconstitutional and opposed to public policy, null and void and the same being ultra vires the Constitution of India.

Prayer in W.P. No.457 of 2015:

	Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of declaration declaring the Guidelines No.DBOD.No.BP.BC.9/21.04.048/2012-13 issued by the Reserve Bank of India dated 02.07.2012 relating to the classification of accounts as a non performing asset as arbitrary, unconstitutional and opposed to public policy.

		For petitioner in	M/s. Al. Ganthimathi
		both the WPs	for M/s. K.P.S. Palanivel Rajan
	
		For R1 in		Mr. C. Kanagaraj
		both the WPs

COMMON ORDER

The question involved in these writ petitions, viz., the validity and constitutionality of Section 2(1)(o) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, came up for consideration in a batch of writ petitions. A Division Bench of this Court, in Deccan Chronicles Holdings Ltd. and others vs. Union of India, represented by its Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, New Delhi- 110 011 and others1, upheld the constitutional validity of the said provision and dismissed the said batch of writ petitions.

2. In view of the above, these writ petitions are also dismissed. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

  							(S.K.A.J.)    (M.V.J.)
								09.01.2015

Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
cad


SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J.
and
M. VENUGOPAL, J.
cad
To
1	The Secretary to Government
	Ministry of Finance
	Department of Economic Affairs
	Room No.34-C
	New Delhi 110 001 - India

2	The Chairman
	Reserve Bank of India
		and Managing Director
	6 Parliament Street
	New Delhi 110 001

3	The Authorised Officer
	Punjab National Bank
	BO: AGMO, Tirupur
	No.54, Sabari Street
	Tirupur 641 601	

W.P. Nos. 456 and 457 of 2015









09.01.2015