Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Gujarat Tea Processors And Packers Ltd vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 4 July, 2016

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi, A.J. Shastri

                  C/SCA/9433/2016                                            ORDER



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                     SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9433 of 2016

         ==========================================================
              GUJARAT TEA PROCESSORS AND PACKERS LTD....Petitioner(s)
                                    Versus
                      STATE OF GUJARAT & 2....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         UCHIT N SHETH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
         ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GP/PP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 3
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI

                                    Date : 04/07/2016


                                     ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

1. On   20.06.2016,   while   issuing   notice,   we   had  passed following order.

"1. Case of the petitioner is that, pending  appeal   before   the   Commissioner   (Appeals)  against the order of the Assessing Officer,  the petitioner was initially made to deposit  a total sum of Rs. 18 lacs by the Appellate  Commissioner.   On   such   deposit   further  recovery   was   stayed   till   15.06.2016.  However,   the   Appellate   Commissioner   refused  to   extend   the   stay   thereafter   and   orally  conveyed   the   petitioner   to   deposit   20%   of  the   total   tax   demand   arising   out   of   the  assessment   order   inclusive   of   penalty   and  interest.
2. Learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner   submitted that there is an error apparent on   Page 1 of 3 HC-NIC Page 1 of 3 Created On Wed Jul 06 02:13:53 IST 2016 C/SCA/9433/2016 ORDER the   face   of   the   record   committed   by   the  Assessing   Officer   in   imposing   tax   at   the  rate of 15% instead of 5% applicable even if  the view point of the Assessing Officer that   the   branch   transfer   of   gift   articles   would   invite tax. If such error is corrected, the   principal tax liability may not increase Rs.  30 lacs inclusive of penalty and interest.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances  of   the   case,   if   the   petitioner   deposits  further   sum   of   Rs.   7   lacs   with   the   State  authorities   so   as   to   make   a   total   pre­ deposit of Rs. 25 lacs, there shall be stay  against further recovery. This shall be done  latest by 27.06.2016.
4. Notice returnable on 04.07.2016."

2. Learned   counsel   Shri   Uchit   Sheth   for   the  petitioner pointed out that in the above order while  referring to the petitioner's principal tax liability,  we had referred to a sum of Rs.30 lacs which should be  exclusive of penalty and interest instead of which, we  had   referred   to   as   inclusive.     It   appears   to   be   a  typographical error.  

3. Learned   counsel   Shri   Sheth   stated   that   the  condition   of   depositing  further   sum  of  Rs.7   lacs   is  complied   with.     Thus,   the   petitioner   has   by   now  deposited total of Rs.25 lacs by way of pre­deposit,  which   was   a   condition   initially   imposed   by   the  Appellate Authority.

Page 2 of 3 HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Wed Jul 06 02:13:53 IST 2016 C/SCA/9433/2016 ORDER

4. Under the circumstances, we request the Appellate  Authority   to   hear   the   appeal   of   the  petitioner   on  merits   without   insisting   on   collecting   any   further  pre­deposit. Till this appeal is disposed of, further  recovery shall also stand stayed.   We have expressed  no opinion on rival contentions.

5. Petition disposed of accordingly.

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (A.J. SHASTRI, J.) ANKIT Page 3 of 3 HC-NIC Page 3 of 3 Created On Wed Jul 06 02:13:53 IST 2016