Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

L.B. Thiyagarajan vs M/S. Astor Technologies on 17 March, 2021

Author: C.V.Karthikeyan

Bench: C.V.Karthikeyan

                                                                 1

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                         Dated : 17.03.2021

                                                             CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

                                                         C.S.No. 610 of 2002

                  L.B. Thiyagarajan                                                         ... Plaintiff

                                                                Vs.

                  1. M/s. Astor Technologies,
                     No.14, Readymade Garment Complex,
                     Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Estate,
                     Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.
                     Represented by its Partner Mr.S. Vasudevan,


                  2. Vasudevan
                  3. K.Ravi                                                                 ... Defendants



                  Prayer:

                            Civil Suit is filed under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC r/w Order V Rule 1

                  of O.S.Rules along with Counter claim under Order VIII Rule 6A and 6B of

                  CPC.,            (a)   a   permanent     injunction   restraining   the   plaintiff,      his

                  partners/proprietor as the case may be, servants, agents, heirs, legal

                  representatives, successors-in business, assigns, distributors, stockists or any

                  one claiming through or under him from directly or indirectly in any manner
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                            2

                  infringing the defendants' exclusive copyright in the Computer Aided

                  Software design "ASTOR EAZY DESIGN"or VASTRA ME or under any

                  other title, for garment manufacturing technology or in any other manner

                  whatsoever;

                            (b)    a   permanent    injunction   restraining   the    plaintiff,   his

                  partners/proprietor as the case may be, servants, agents, heirs, legal

                  representatives, successors-in business, assigns, distributors, stockists or any

                  one claiming through or under him from directly or indirectly in any manner

                  passing off and enabling others to pass off the CAD software for garments

                  industry by sale, offering for sale, soliciting orders from customers of the

                  defendants or from any other third parties, installing and from dealing with

                  the same as and for the plaintiff's CAD software, business and/or in any other

                  manner whatsoever;

                            (c) the plaintiff be directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- as liquidated

                  damages being the loss wrongfully caused by the plaintiff to the defendants'

                  business, reputation and goodwill on account of his dealing with the CAD

                  software designated by the defendants for garments;

                            (d) the plaintiff be directed to surrender to the defendants for

                  destruction, the pirated CAD software for garment manufacturing

                  technology, floppy disks, CPU, CD-Roms, Computer Locks and other
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                            3

                  materials relating to the defendants'            CAD software known by the title

                  ASTOR Eazy Design or VASTRA ME or under any other title.

                            (e) award costs of the suit proceedings.



                                         For Plaintiff       : Mr.A.Prabhakara Reddy

                                         For Defendants      : Mr.Chandhira Pradeep Kumar

                                                           -----

                                                JUDGMENT

Heard Mr.A.Prabhakara Reddy, learned Counsel for the plaintiff and Mr.Chandhira Pradeep Kumar, learned Counsel for the defendant.

2. The learned Counsel for the plaintiff stating that the parties had settled the issue between themselves. However, the Memorandum of Compromise is not available in the Court bundle and the learned counsels stated that they could not contact their respective .

3. The suit is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the plaintiff to institute a fresh suit with respect to the Copyright in the computer software CAD/CAM used for Garment Manufacturing Technology either against the defendants or against anybody acting under the defendants or against any third party if a fresh cause of action arises. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 4

4. With the above said observations, the Civil Suit is dismissed.

No order as to costs.

17.03.2021 Index:Yes/No Web:Yes/No Speaking order : Yes / No msm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 5 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

msm C.S.No. 610 of 2002 17.03.2021 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/