Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Aditya Construction Through Its ... vs The Union Of India And Others on 26 February, 2019

Author: A. M. Dhavale

Bench: S. V. Gangapurwala, A. M. Dhavale

                               (1)                     1-wp-8120-2018 & Ors.



          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                    1 WRIT PETITION NO.8120 OF 2018

 M/S S J SURANA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS THROUGH
 ITS PARTNER RAJESH SUGANCHAND SURANA ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                    ..RESPONDENTS

                                  WITH
                    2 WRIT PETITION NO.8121 OF 2018

 VIJAY HINGU YADAV                                ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                    ..RESPONDENTS

                                  WITH
                    3 WRIT PETITION NO.8122 OF 2018

 ABHIJIT DNYANDEV PATIL                           ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                    ..RESPONDENTS

                                  WITH
                    4 WRIT PETITION NO.8123 OF 2018

 M/S AISHWARYA CONSTRUCTION THROUGH IS PROPRIETOR S
 D JAGTAP                            ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                    ..RESPONDENTS

                                  WITH
                    5 WRIT PETITION NO.8124 OF 2018

 M/S ASHOK DODHU KAVATHE THROUGH ITS PARTNER ASHOK


::: Uploaded on - 28/02/2019             ::: Downloaded on - 21/03/2019 22:52:03 :::
                                (2)                     1-wp-8120-2018 & Ors.



 DODHU KAVATHE                                    ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                    ..RESPONDENTS

                                  WITH
                    6 WRIT PETITION NO.8125 OF 2018

 M/S PITAMBAR VENSI THROUGH ITS PARTNER PITAMBAR
 VENSITEKWANI                        ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                    ..RESPONDENTS

                                  WITH
                    7 WRIT PETITION NO.8126 OF 2018

 NAVIN RANCHODDAS RATHOD                          ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                    ..RESPONDENTS

                                  WITH
                    8 WRIT PETITION NO.8127 OF 2018

 M/S VINODKUMAR MOHANLAL THROUGH ITS PARTNER V M
 JADVANI                             ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                    ..RESPONDENTS

                                  WITH
                    9 WRIT PETITION NO.8128 OF 2018

 BALAJI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR
 RADHA KRISHNAN BALA KRISHNAN        ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                    ..RESPONDENTS


::: Uploaded on - 28/02/2019             ::: Downloaded on - 21/03/2019 22:52:03 :::
                                (3)                    1-wp-8120-2018 & Ors.




                                 WITH
                   10 WRIT PETITION NO.8129 OF 2018

 SANJAY SHANKAR CHAUDHARI                        ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                   ..RESPONDENTS

                                 WITH
                   11 WRIT PETITION NO.8130 OF 2018

 NARESH BHARATLAL AGRAWAL                        ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                   ..RESPONDENTS

                                 WITH
                   12 WRIT PETITION NO.8131 OF 2018

 M/S SUNIL B PATIL AND COMPANY THROUGH ITS
 PROPRIETOR SUNIL BHASKAR PATIL      ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                   ..RESPONDENTS

                                 WITH
                   13 WRIT PETITION NO.8132 OF 2018

 M/S DEEP CONSTRUCTION THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR D K
 JAGTAP                              ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                   ..RESPONDENTS

                                 WITH
                   14 WRIT PETITION NO.8133 OF 2018

 D N KELA THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR DHARMENDRA
 NARAYANDASKELA                      ..PETITIONER


::: Uploaded on - 28/02/2019            ::: Downloaded on - 21/03/2019 22:52:03 :::
                                (4)                    1-wp-8120-2018 & Ors.




                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                   ..RESPONDENTS

                                 WITH
                   15 WRIT PETITION NO.8134 OF 2018

 RATAN VISHVAMBHARDAS AGRAWAL                    ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                   ..RESPONDENTS

                                 WITH
                   16 WRIT PETITION NO.8819 OF 2018

 ADITYA CONSTRUCTION THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR PRASAD
 SURESH KULKARNI                     ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                   ..RESPONDENTS

                                 WITH
                   17 WRIT PETITION NO.8820 OF 2018

 M/S PRAMOD NARAYAN SARODE THROUGH ITS PARTNER P N
 SARODE                              ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                   ..RESPONDENTS

                                 WITH
                   18 WRIT PETITION NO.8821 OF 2018

 NAWALKISHOR TEKCHAND MITTAL                     ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                   ..RESPONDENTS




::: Uploaded on - 28/02/2019            ::: Downloaded on - 21/03/2019 22:52:03 :::
                                (5)                          1-wp-8120-2018 & Ors.



                                 WITH
                   19 WRIT PETITION NO.8822 OF 2018

 M/S ANAND BUILDCON THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MAHENDRA
 MOHANLAL CHORDIYA                   ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS        ..RESPONDENTS
                         WITH
           20 WRIT PETITION NO.8823 OF 2018

 TAPI SJS THROUGH ITS PARTNER RAJESH SUGANCHAND
 SURANA                              ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS                         ..RESPONDENTS
                                 WITH
                   79 WRIT PETITION NO.1624 OF 2018
                          WITH WP/1619/2018

 M/S MANOHAR PITAMBAR THROUGH ITS PARTNER MANOHAR
 PITAMBAR JADVANI                    ..PETITIONER

                  VERSUS

 THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS       ..RESPONDENTS
                        ...
 Mr. A. G. Talhar h/f Mr. Pramod S. Gaikwad,
 Advocate for the Petitioners in all Writ Petitions.
 Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar, Mr. P. S. Patil, Mr. S. G.
 Karlekar, Mr. S. K. Tambe, Mr. S. M. Ganachari,
 Mrs. P. V. Diggikar, Mrs. G. L. Deshpande, Mr. K.
 B. Jadhavar, AGP for Respondents-State.
 Mr. D. S. Ladda, Advocate for Respondent No.1. in
 all Writ Petitions.
 Mr. Manish N. Navandar, Advocate for Respondent
 Nos.2 to 4.
                                      ...
                                     CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
                                             A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.
::: Uploaded on - 28/02/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 21/03/2019 22:52:03 :::
                                    (6)                             1-wp-8120-2018 & Ors.



                                       DATED : 26th FEBRUARY, 2019.
 PER COURT:-

1. We have heard Mr. Talhar, learned counsel for petitioners, Mr. Navandar, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 4, Mr. Ladda, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and learned A.G.P. also.

2. It is submitted by petitioners and the Railway Department that the supplementary agreement would be executed.

3. Mr. Talhar, learned counsel submits that petitioners would approach the Railway within a week.

4. In view of the guidelines of the Railway Department dated 27.10.2017, Mr. Navandar, learned counsel makes a statement that the amount of GST has not been deducted by the Railways from the petitioners.

5. The supplementary agreement may be executed between the petitioners and Railways as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months if there is no other impediment.

6. With these observations, writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.



      (A. M. DHAVALE)                          (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
             JUDGE                                              JUDGE
 Devendra/February-19




::: Uploaded on - 28/02/2019                         ::: Downloaded on - 21/03/2019 22:52:03 :::