Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Madras High Court

Venkatasami Naicken And Anr. vs Ramanthan Chettiar And Ors. on 15 February, 1910

Equivalent citations: 5IND. CAS.916A

JUDGMENT

1. Under the judgment of the Privy Council in Umeschunder Sircar v. Zahur Fatima 18 C. 164 : 17 I.A. 201 the plaintiffs are entitled to interest calculated according to the mortgage deed and not according to the decree. The case of Ganga Das Bhattar v. Jogendranath Mitra 5 C.L.J. 315 : 11 C.W.N. 403 relied upon by the District Judge, has been dissented from in Thenappa Chettiar v. Marimuthu Nadan 31 M. 258 : M.L.J. 344 : 4 M.L.T. 293 which follows Umeschunder Sircar v. Zahur Fatima 18 C. 164 : 17 I.A. 201. We must, therefore, ask the District Judge to find on this basis, the proportionate amount which plaint item No. 4 is liable to contribute.

2. The finding should be submitted with in four weeks from the date of this order and seven days will be allowed for filing objection.