Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

Smt. Veermati, Baghpat vs Ito, Uttar Pradesh on 20 March, 2017

                                                           ITA No. 6406/Del./2016
                                                         Assessment Year: 2009-10

                 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                     (DELHI BENCH "SMC" NEW DELHI)

               BEFORE SHRI B.P. JAIN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                              ITA No. 6406/Del./2016
                             Assessment Year: 2009-10
     Veermati                            Vs.   ITO
     L/H and W/o. of Lt. Sh. Hari              Baraut,
     Verma, M/s. Hari Har Services             Distt. Baghpat,
     Station, 254, Ward No.10,                 Uttar Pradesh
      Indrapuri, Tatiri Distt.
     Baghpat
     (Applicant)                               (Respondent)
     (PAN: BJAPS3629B)


                  Assessee by:       None
                  Revenue by:        Ms. Bedobina Chaudhari, Sr. DR
     Date of hearing                     20/03/2017
     Date of pronouncement               20/03/2017


                                     ORDER


PER B.P. JAIN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1. This appeal of the assessee arises from the order of ld. CIT(A), Meerut vide order dated 4.8.2016 for the A.Y. 2009-10.

2. None appeared in the present case in spite of valid service of notice and therefore keeping in view the provisions of Rule 19(2) of Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules 1963, as were considered in the Page 1 of 3 case of CIT vs. Multi Plan India Ltd. 38 ITD 320 (Delhi), the assessee's appeal is dismissed.

3. I also rely upon the decision of Hon'ble M.P. High Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojira Holker vs. CW2 220 ITR 480 and the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bhatta Chargee and Anr. In ITA 118 page 461, relevant pages 477 and 478 in this regard.

4. Respectfully following the above decisions of various courts of law, I dismiss the appeal of the assessee with liberty to recall the appeal on movement of proper application.

5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

6. Pronounced in the open court on 20.03.2017.

(B.P. JAIN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 20.03.2017 Narender Copy forwarded to:

1)    Appellant


                                                                  Page 2 of 3
 2)      Respondent

3)      CIT

4)      CIT (Appeals)

 5)     DR: ITAT

                                                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR



                                                     Date

Draft dictated on                            20.03.2017

Draft placed before author                   20.03.2017

Draft proposed & placed before the second member Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS 20 .3.2017 Kept for pronouncement on File sent to the Bench Clerk 20.3.2017 Date on which file goes to the AR Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. Date of dispatch of Order.

Page 3 of 3