Karnataka High Court
The Branch Manager The New India ... vs Leelakeshava on 18 January, 2010
2 Si€%.1"I'E}ZMAN'l"1T'i KUMAR.
1 1(.)."'3. 18"" E6 MAIN.
5?" BLOCTK. RAJAJENAGAR.
E"-$2'-\1\l(3r\E,(f)I-{i:I -- $0
:3. ?'a'Ri.K.l)lLIPKUMAR.
gs/0 SUBBA RAQ' n
.\EO.244-A. RAILWAY" QUARTERS.
(')KAI-EPURA. V
:sA_Nc;A1_,oRE A 56. ..R~ES'PO_N[3,EN'1'S
(By an SHRIPAD V SHAS.'l'~R_I. .1,
R :3 s£~:R\/E1), _
N<>'m_:E TO R43 1')isPENsED-T.w"I'1'H V/_.QV 'mf_i. } 1.2010 1
This iVfF.AL.I',":S_ i.?'3[._i}:fc)i' MV Act against: the
_}uc::i;__{r1'1c1'1I' anéi 23L-iv_;.e1i'(i"'*-- ' 1..8.3;2"O06 passed in MVC
Nu.2,E}2/2()Q3_Oi';._fi1é:;;fiVI_e ..(_)f._1hé *I»..Ad*il1. Civil JL1.dge [S1'.Dn} &.
M..~'\{"J'. £:3V2'1:'1gé1.E<'1196_§ §1§1z:'.;1i'~.._'I)ist1'i("E.. BaI1gaEore awarding
r,-mupe:é:"1sai'..icm ofR52-~.,2Ei,O0O')'~'with ir1teresf. at 6% pa. frozn
{Em (.ia1'.c of pr-;E'.i'i[i(:)1'1' 1.;_iII ..jVja'.!.\,f'1':%'§51':-«*.:".'
'1'iuf..~--'; .. MFA" ::<)1'nVii'1gj__§ '-'_)l'I 1'01' ordcrrs this day, the Court
firflaf l i\'c-¥1'0«;1§.I 116' f0] E ()\x?i'1'1g_§ ;
JUDGMENT
"!"h"iLé: 2';1;)p{é;.1l.5is clilmgtted 21ga1_i11SIT the j1.1cign1ent z«.1.nd award. _°7.__?_(4;;'m-_: 18...::§.2_(>{)(3. pa.sss::(iI by the MAC'1'._ Bangalore Rural ;:§:'s;i%A'riA;~»%Tam Mvc 310.292/2003.
(3 ;1.p1x"l1z'11":I--I:1s1..::'2;111('rc-* ('on1.(.*:.".1c'1.~s that 1}1e=:11: was 11.0 v2.1}i(i.-.__d1'ivi11g 1i{'(']!St.' at the lime of z=3cvi(ic1'11 and t.hcrcf(:)1*c*. the "I'1'ii.bI:2 !'?}:'E1_1v"'-.-?\fE1S not _j11sEE.f'ic='('i in fa1$1.e11E1'1§_-.g {he liability on ific? .'21.;3f;2<=:*i}»:1f11.¥' In..~;n1'z11'1<'o (.ji<)r111:)211":y. It is not in d.i'.<;j51.1"E'.o «_t.11«a{..;l;.}.1 €"«53€)}it":§r was 7 in fo1*(:c. 'I'1':(.' e1p}:>(=-*11am 11:15 not led 2;1'1i1_y:'c:yi£it::'1i.::_::'Air: S}1(3NV" .i,i"1a,1 HIE'? :"E(i(.%r of £110 m0t,0:" Cycle d'id "*11()1 v"2;1id'drivi:1g 1iu.'11.<.sr 211. t'1'1(: Lime of 2'u:.-;?1(.i._c1'1t.r' Mé:;'¢1y""i:3¢c:a1.usé"Charge sheet has ix-'cn £.'i1c==(:¥ 2:1;2;ai11ss1'. the 1-1'-dVc1* f<Jf':i.1'1e._:;:ai§Vt.Q£i- r*.y(.'.1e. it cannot:
be i:1fe1*1*ed {hat3-'ti'1'§:V V.!"idc::1j oi' --*:=~l:1e"'vni'<):[(>1ixiycle did not posses \.»'e.1iic.i (11"ivi:.'1g §iCe.;-i"s_fr.'. efi: »t.11"'e.5.'jvvL*;ii1'xer <:>1";9;{.7c:ide:1'1€.. T}"1('3i'€fOl'€. the '§":'1'l.m1mI iE:£1:~s ('1'*1'~;»:\1:-;:_-«1_yIV.V i'as.jsi"E'1j1crd/«Kliability 011 t"1T1(==* a;')pei1a1'1I« iélf.-si..{l'2ill(.'.(' ('.fQ1T1'11.j)Ve11:5I_aI-Ki 1f_1."e:_i(")'c:I% 1101 call for i11t'e1*f<-?1"cmtc. l._'()':.«:. EH1 ;j_a<'> E"z.1i"2v.;--:e...q1..1amum is (',()l'1(TL'.:.'l'1€.'('i. this Court in %3..sp.N:m ..:&..ANR. vs. A.R.SHIVASHANKAR & ORS.
..,v1*<;';)()f14é_§.'i'MA 2008 KAR Page 1896, f<)}..10wi:1gg the .. ff._.ju:.1<'ri.,;;111cn1" in":.Manju Devi & Ant. Vs. Musafar Paswan 8: Anr. 1--Ti.*V.§'${}t""'«'.,"(':i"A_' in 2005 ACJ Page 99 ha:1--.~; anvewdeci 21 surn of "}.~€:}.2._f»Z:73.(.)()(.)/ ~ E"<.')1" 2': 1')c.)j_¢ n;_;_'L.~(1 2;1.i:)c)1.:E 113 _\;cre'-11'.$5. In i.}"1c p1*cse1'1{ 3