Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Deepak Sood And Others vs Shri Roshan Lal Ias And Another on 21 July, 2009

Author: Rakesh Kumar Garg

Bench: Rakesh Kumar Garg

      In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
                                ...


                                      COCP No. 72 of 2009
                                      Date of decision: July 21,2009

Deepak Sood and others                                       ..Petitioners.

                                  Versus

Shri Roshan Lal IAS and another                              ..Respondents

Coram:          Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg

Present:     Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Advocate
             for the petitioner
             Mr. S.K.Hooda, Sr.DAG,Haryana
             for respondent No.1
             Mr. Neeraj Jain, Sr. Advocate
             with Mr. Sandeep Chaturvedi, Advocate
             and Mr. Umang Shankar, Advocate
             for the respondent No.2
                    ...


Rakesh Kumar Garg,J(Oral)

Reply on behalf of respondents has been filed today. Apart from the reply, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has also placed on record photo copies of memo. dated 20.7.2009 and has stated that in view of the aforesaid memo, the claim of the petitioner has been satisfied and nothing remains to be done by the respondents.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the respondents have not updated their service books as per memo dated 20.7.2009 and they be further directed to update their service books so that the petitioners may get the consequential benefits.

Be that as it may, in view of the stand taken by the respondents that in compliance of the orders passed by this court, the respondents have passed the necessary orders. I am not inclined to proceed further in the contempt petition.

However, if the petitioners are left with any other grouse, they are at liberty to seek any other appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

Contempt petition stands disposed of .

Rule discharged.

July 21, 2009                                         (RAKESH KUMAR GARG)
           nk                                                 JUDGE