Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Kishore Kunal vs The State Of Bihar on 24 April, 2024

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    CRIMINAL REVISION No.203 of 2021
                               Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Nalanda
                  ======================================================
                  Kishore Kunal, Son of Sri Jagdish Prasad, Resident Of Village- Navichak,
                  P.O.- Shahjahanpur, Police Station- Daniyawan, District- Patna. At Present
                  Deputy Manager United Bank Of India, Branch Arambag Hugli, District-
                  Hugli (West Bengal), Pin Code- 712601
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar
            2.     Nitu Singh, Wife Of Kishore Kunal, Daughter Of Devendra Prasad, Resident
                   Of Village- Navichak P.O.- Shahjahanpur, P.S.- Daniyawan, District- Patna,
                   At Present Village Dharahra, P.O.- Dharahra, P.S.- Silao, District- Nalanda
                                                                             ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s    :         None
                  For the Respondent/s    :         Mrs. Asha Kumari, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    24-04-2024

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2. It is found from record that on 12 th March 2024, though, the petitioner was not represented, this Court directed the petitioner to remove the defects within two weeks from the date of the order, however, the defects have not been removed till date. The conduct of the petitioner presumably shows that he is not interested to represent the instant revision. Accordingly, the instant revision is dismissed for default.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J) Suraj Dubey/-

U      T