Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 10]

Bombay High Court

The State Of Maharashtra vs Jagan Gagansingh Nepali @ ... on 26 September, 2018

Author: Sarang V. Kotwal

Bench: S. S. Shinde, Sarang V. Kotwal

                                         1 / 2                 903-APEAL-407-11.odt




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                         CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.407 OF 2011

    The State of Maharashtra                               .... Appellant

                     versus

    Devendra Baburao Jagtap alias
    J. D. & Ors.                                           ... Respondents

                                      WITH
                          CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.20 OF 2011

    The State of Maharashtra                               .... Appellant

                     versus

    Jagan Gagansignh Nepali 
    @ Jagya and another                                    ... Respondents
                                      .......

    •       Mrs.M.H. Mhatre, APP for Appellant/State.
    •       Mr.Abhaykumar Apte, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 in 
            Appeal No.407/2011.
    •       Ms.Pooja Joshi i/b. Mr.A.M. Saraogi, Advocate for Respondent
            No.2 in Appeal No.20/2011.

                                  CORAM :  S. S. SHINDE &
                                           SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 26th SEPTEMBER, 2018.

Nesarikar ::: Uploaded on - 27/09/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 28/09/2018 02:08:14 ::: 2 / 2 903-APEAL-407-11.odt P.C. :

1. There is request from the learned Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Mumbai, for sending back the original Record and Proceedings of Criminal Appeal No.407 of 2011 in MCOC Special Case No.5 of 2010 converted in Sessions Case No.86 of 2011. Accordingly the Registry has listed this matter in the order category.
2. Learned Counsel appearing for the parties have no objection to send back the original Record and Proceedings to the City Civil & Sessions Court, Mumbai. Accordingly, the Registry to send back the original Record and Proceedings of the aforementioned case to the Registry of the City Civil & Sessions Court, Mumbai.
3. Since, this Appeal filed by the State is pending before this Court, the Registry of City Civil & Sessions Court, Mumbai, to preserve the Record and Proceedings.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.) ::: Uploaded on - 27/09/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 28/09/2018 02:08:14 :::