Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Shri.Ram Kirpal Yadav vs Banking Division on 27 September, 2010

                         dsUnzh; lwpuk vk;ksx
                               Central Information Commission
             Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office
                    iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus
                     ubZ fnYyh ­ 110067 / New Delhi - 110067
                                      (Ph:  011­26160943)
                                          *****


                                                            No.CIC/SM/C/2010/000776
                                                                                             
                                                               Dated:  27 September  2010


Name of the Complainant               :     Shri Ram Kripal Yadav
                                            Vill - Salahpur, Post - Dhavrua,
                                            Distt - Ambedkar Nagar, 
                                            U.P. - 224 159.


Name of the Public Authority          :     The Appellate Authority 
                                            Baroda Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank,
                                            Head Office, A­1,
                                            Civil Lines, Rai Bareilly.


                                          ORDER

Shri   Ram  Kripal   Yadav  of   Ambedkar  Nagar  has  complained  to   the   Central  Information   Commission   that   he   received   no   reply/information   from   the   Branch  Manager/Central Public Information Officer although he had filed his RTI­application  on 11 June 2010.  A copy each of the RTI­application and the complaint are enclosed  for ready reference. 

2. It   is   noted   that   the   Complainant   did   not   have   an   opportunity   to   go   to   the  Appellate Authority and has directly approached the Commission with his complaint.  In exercise of powers vested under Section 18(1) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act,  we   direct   the   Appellate   Authority   to   enquire   into   the   allegations   made   by   the  Complainant and after giving him an opportunity of hearing, to pass an appropriate  order   with   a   view   to   ensuring   that   the   desired   information   is   provided   to   the  Complainant without any further loss of time.

3. We also direct the Appellate Authority to obtain the explanation of the Branch  Manager/CPIO in writing for not providing the information in time and to forward the  same to us along with his comments before 27 October 2010.  We will decide on the  imposition of penalty on the Branch Manager/CPIO in terms of Section 20(1) of the  Right to Information (RTI) Act thereafter.    

4. In   case   the   Complainant   is   not   satisfied   with   the   orders   of   the   Appellate  Authority, he is free to approach this Commission again in second appeal.

5. The Commission ordered accordingly.

(Satyananda Mishra) Information Commissioner Authenticated   true   copy.     Additional   copies   of   orders   shall   be   supplied   against  application   and   payment   of   the   charges   prescribed   under   the   Act   to   the   CPIO   of   this  Commission.

(Vijay Bhalla) Assistant Registrar Copy to:

The Regional Manager of the Baroda Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank, Rai Bareilly is directed to  forward a copy of this order to the designated  Appellate Authority  for implementing our  directions.