Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Rajesh Jagdishprasad Agarwal vs The State Of Maharashtra on 30 July, 2019

Author: Revati Mohite Dere

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere

                                              1/3                        46-aba.1554.2019.doc


nsc.
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                   ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1554 OF 2019

       Rajesh Jagdishprasad Agarwal                                      ...Applicant
           Versus
       The State of Maharashtra                                          ...Respondent

       Mr.Aabad Ponda, i/b Mr.Karma Vivan, for the Applicant.

       Mr.V.V.Gangurde, A.P.P for the Respondent - State.


                                           CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

                                           DATE : 30th JULY, 2019

       P.C. :


       1.                   Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.



       2.                 By this application, the applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in

       connection with C.R. No.583 of 2019, registered with the Kondhwa Police

       Station, Pune, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 304 r/w

       34 of the Indian Penal Code.



       3.                 Mr.Ponda, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the




            ::: Uploaded on - 31/07/2019                   ::: Downloaded on - 01/08/2019 00:01:41 :::
                                 2/3                          46-aba.1554.2019.doc


applicant was an architect of M/s.Alcon Landmarks and became a partner

of M/s.Alcon Landmarks on 2nd September, 2011. He submitted that on 9th

March, 2013, the applicant gave his no objection certificate (NOC) for the

said project and for appointment of another architect for the said project.

Learned Counsel has tendered an affidavit-in-rejoinder of the applicant.

The same is taken on record. Learned counsel relied on page 67 of the said

affidavit-in-rejoinder i.e. No Objection Certificate dated 9 th March, 2013.

According to the learned counsel on 25 th March, 2013, the applicant was

substituted as an architect by another architect viz. Vivek Agarwal, who

was subsequently arrested after the wall collapsed. He relied on page 69 of

the said affidavit-in-rejoinder, in support of his submission. He also relied

on the Deed of Retirement dated 15th October, 2013, which is on page 70 of

the affidavit-in-rejoinder. According to the learned counsel, the applicant

was not connected or concerned as an architect or as a partner of M/s.Alcon

Landmarks having retired from the said project, much prior to the incident

of wall collapse.



4.             Learned APP has filed an affidavit setting out the complicity

of the applicant.




 ::: Uploaded on - 31/07/2019                  ::: Downloaded on - 01/08/2019 00:01:41 :::
                                 3/3                             46-aba.1554.2019.doc


5.             It appears that the documents tendered by the applicant in the

affidavit-in-rejoinder are not disputed by the police.



6.             Considering the aforesaid, in the meantime, till the next date,

the applicant is granted interim protection on the following terms and

conditions :-

                                      ORDER

(i) In the event of the arrest, the applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-, with one or two sureties in the like amount ;

(ii) The applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station on 6th August, 2019 and 7th August, 2019, between 10.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon, and thereafter as and when called.

7. Stand over to 13th August, 2019.

8. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

::: Uploaded on - 31/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 01/08/2019 00:01:41 :::