Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Setab Uddin & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 14 December, 2022

Author: Abhijit Gangopadhyay

Bench: Abhijit Gangopadhyay

W
14. 12. 2022

     SA/BP               WPA 13700 of 2021
 Sl. 2,3 and 4                  With
                        CAN 1 of 2022
Court No. 17.           CAN 2 of 2022


                          Setab Uddin & Ors.
                               Vs.
                     The State of West Bengal & Ors.

                                 With

                          WPA 17273 of 2021
                               with
                            CAN 1 of 2022


                        Nasrin Khatun
                               Vs.
                     The State of West Bengal & Ors.
                                 With

                         WPA 13701 of 2021
                               with
                            CAN 1 of 2022

                       Md. Abdul Gani Ansari
                               Vs.
                     The State of West Bengal & Ors.


                 Mr. Firdous Samim
                 Ms. Gopa Biswas
                 Ms. Mousumi Hazra
                         .. for the Petitioners.


                 Dr. S.K. Patra
                 Ms. Supriya Dubey
                                     ..for SSC.

                 Mr. Sirsanya Bandyopadhyay
                 Mr. Shamim ul Bari
                 Mr. Arka Kumar Nag
                              ..for the State in
                    WPA 13700 of 2021 and WPA
                    13701 of 2021.
                          2




        Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Ld. Deputy Solicitor
                                General of India
        Mr. Arijit Majumdar
                        ..for CBI

       Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharya
                        ..for WBBSE

       Mr. Partha Sarathi Bhattacharya, Sr. Advocate
       Mr. Anindya Bose
       Mr. Diptendu Mondal
                ..for the applicant in
             CAN 2 of 2022 of WPA 13700 of 2021,
             applicant in CAN 1 of 2022 of
             WPA 17273 of 2021 and WPA
             13701 of 2021

1. The School Service Commission will come up with the

   report as was directed earlier on 16th December, 2022.

   The West Bengal Board of Secondary Education has

   come up with a report signed by its Secretary dated

   13.12.2022. Copy of the report has been given to the

   other appearing parties. From the said report, as has

   been submitted by Ms. Bhattacharya, learned advocate

   for the Board that out of 183 numbers of candidates

   who according to the School Service Commission was

   recommended wrongly, only 80 persons joined against

   such recommendations, but 103 numbers of persons

   did not join the schools. It is evident that they were not

   interested to join.

     All these 183 candidates were recommended for the

   post of Assistant Teachers in Classes IX and X of the

   Government aided schools.

     According to the School Service Commission, 81
                          3




     persons joined and 102 numbers of persons did not

     join.

       Therefore, it appears that there is a discrepancy in

     respect of a single candidate and I direct Dr. Patra,

     learned advocate for the School Service Commission and

     Ms. Bhattacharya, learned advocate for the Board that

     they will sit together immediately in the Commission's

     office and to find out why this discrepancy has

     happened and they will take appropriate steps to

     finalize the number of non-joining candidates either for

     inclusion of one candidate or for exclusion of one

     candidate.

       The dates are to be changed as to recommendations

     and appointments.

2.   In any event it appears that at least 102 numbers of

     declared vacancies (in different subjects and categories

     etc.) have not been filled up as 102 numbers of

     candidates did not join. Therefore, in those vacancies

     wait listed candidates in their place, in the subjects

     according    to   the   merit,   category   etc.   shall   be

     recommended by the School Service Commission by 24th

     December, 2022 and the Board will issue appointment

     letters to them by 28th December, 2022.

3.    All such appointment letters are to be uploaded by the

     Board in its website by 28th December, 2022. This
                         4




     exercise of giving recommendation and appointment to

     the genuine candidates will continue on detection of the

     illegally appointed candidates and I believe now the

     tears from the eyes of the genuine candidates will be

     wiped and the anxiety which has arisen in their mind as

     to whether they would be given appointments or not,

     will be removed.

4. There might be a question that the panel and the wait

     list has already been expired but it is to be kept in mind

     by all concerned that the wait listed candidates' right

     accrued on the day when it has come to knowledge that

     102 numbers of recommended candidates did not join

     the recommended schools. The Commission also did not

     knowing this. Therefore, they will be entitled to get

     recommendations and appointments for validity period

     of the wait list from that date as has been indicated

     above.

5.   As this is a clear case of corruption and organised crime

     as being unearthed by CBI the wait listed candidates

     cannot be deprived by the contention that the panel and

     the wait list have been expired. Therefore, there shall be

     no illegality in recommending the wait listed candidates

     in the place of at least 102 numbers of vacancies. If it is

     103 numbers of vacancies would be known later.

6.   CBI has in the meantime intimated this court that all
                        5




    particulars of the hard disc recovered by them from

    Gaziabad, U.P. have been given to School Service

    Commission. CBI has also seized the hard disc as to the

    marks etc. of candidates from the School Service

    Commission's data room at its Salt Lake Office. It has

    already come to light that in Gaziabad hard disc, the

    OMR sheets of the candidates are recorded whereas in

    the School Service Commission's hard disc, there is no

    recording of those OMR sheets. Original OMR sheets

    have also been destroyed by the Commission. It has

    been found that the marks obtained by the candidates

    against the OMR sheets in Gaziabad hard disc while, for

    example, are 3, 4, 5 etc. (and also some blank OMR

    sheets) but the marks obtained by the same candidates

    in the Salt Lake hard disc are, say, have been increased

    to 53, 54 and 55 etc. This is the result of organized

    crime of School Service Commission sellers.

7. Today I direct the Commission to publish all OMR sheets

    of the empanelled and wait listed candidates for the

    posts of Assistant Teachers for Classes IX and X.

    Besides such publication of all such OMR sheets as

    directed above, a table is also to be published giving the

    names, roll numbers, the subjects and categories of the

    candidates whose OMR sheets would be published. This

    publication of OMR sheets and the table is to be done
                        6




    by 20th December, 2022. The counselling is to be held

    by the School Service Commission in respect of the wait

    listed candidates of different subjects, categories etc. by

    24th December, 2022 and recommendations are to be

    handed over on the same day at the time of counselling

    to those candidates.

8. A note of caution and a specific order is required to be

    given by this court in respect of the wait listed

    candidates as it has also been submitted by CBI that

    there are some wait listed candidates who have been

    benefited from the corruption and organised crime

    which is evident from the OMR sheets seen from

    Gaziabad hard disc when compared to the hard disc of

    Commission's Office at Salt Lake. This court makes it

    clear that if subsequently on verification of any wait

    listed candidates' OMR sheets etc. it is found that such

    wait listed candidate benefited out of corruptions and

    organized crime aforesaid is recommended and given

    appointment because of the order passed today, the

    recommendation and appointment shall be withdrawn

    on such ground of illegality, corruption and as a result

    of the organized crime.

9. As   it   has   already    been   found   that   there   are

    manipulations so far as the marks obtained by the

    candidates in the OMR sheets have been made in a
                        7




    large scale which is more than 8000 in respect of

    Assistant Teachers in Classes IX and X, Assistant

    Teachers in Classes XI and XII, Group-C candidates and

    Group-D candidates and the money trail which is

    coming to light in such organized crime is required to be

    investigated forthwith and for this purpose I add

    Enforcement Directorate (ED) as party respondent in

this application. ED shall be made party in respect of other applications also where CBI has been made a party.

10. At the relevant point of time of this organized crime the Chairman of the School Service Commission was one Subires Bhattacharya and the President of the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education was one Kalyanmoy Ganguly and they had some conduits and some agents in this organized crime of selling jobs in schools who are now in custody. All of these have come in the record of this court in different matters. Therefore, ED must not leave any stone unturned for detecting the money trail including interrogating any person and taking further steps under the law as required, whether he is in custody or is roaming free. However, it is made clear that as of now the investigation by ED will not be court monitored investigation. Court may call for reports from time to 8 time from ED but as of now this court will not monitor the investigation of ED as is being done in the case of CBI. The matters before CBI are under the monitoring of this court.

11. I direct the CBI and ED to exchange their inputs and information required for a complete investigation into the matters and they must have coordination between themselves to find out the money trail and other angles of this organised crime including the persons involved in it.

12. I direct the petitioners to add Enforcement Directorate a party in course of this day.

The report filed by the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education is kept on record.

I direct the petitioners to communicate the gist of this order to Enforcement Directorate forthwith.

List this matter on 16.12.2022 when it will be taken up at 2.00 P.M. (Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J.) 9 Rul