Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Susmita Mondal vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 9 April, 2026

09/04                     In the High Court at Calcutta
2026
                         Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
AD/08/24
 266312
 NANDY
                                 Appellate Side
  (DO)
                                    WPA/19481/2022

                                    SUSMITA MONDAL
                                          VS.
                            THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

           Mr. Malay Bhattacharya, Advocate
           Mr. Subhrajyoti Ghosh, Advocate
                                                       ......for the Petitioners
           Mr. Santanu Kumar Mitra, Advocate
           Mr. Amartya Pal, Advocate
                                                            ......for the State

           1. The petitioner is aggrieved that the application for
              compassionate appointment, made after the death
              of her father, sometime in 2011, has not been
              considered by the concerned District Inspector of
              Schools (D.I.). The petitioner further submits that at
              the material point of time, i.e. in 2012, the District of
              Burdwan was undivided, which has presently been
              bifurcated into two separate districts.
           2. Consequently,       the   papers        pertaining   to   the
              petitioner's     application      are     untraceable,     as
              indicated in the report filed by respondent no. 5,

the D.I., which is taken on record.

3. The report also specifies that there are certain difficulties in considering the application of the petitioner, in view of the fact, that there is a second application from the same family, being made by the brother of the petitioner. Thus, the petitioner and her brother have both applied for compassionate appointment on the ground of the expiry of their father.

4. In view of the afore-stated fact, that the application has not been considered at all, the respondent no.

Page |2 5, the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Purba Burdwan, is directed to consider both the applications strictly in consonance with G.O. No. 697-ES/S/IS-18/08 dated 09.07.2009, and any other orders and notifications that may be applicable, in accordance with law.

5. If the D.I., finds that there are any missing papers or seeks requisite documents, he shall be at liberty to call for the same from the petitioner and her brother.

6. This entire exercise will be completed by 15.06.2026.

7. With the afore-stated direction, the writ-petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)