Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Ms. Mukul vs Prashant Johar on 4 May, 2022

Author: Mukta Gupta

Bench: Mukta Gupta, Neena Bansal Krishna

                          $~ 26
                          *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          +     MAT.APP.(F.C.) 128/2020
                                 MS. MUKUL                                         ..... Appellant
                                         Represented by:         Mr. Purav Middha, Advocate
                                                                 along with appellant.

                                                    versus

                                 PRASHANT JOHAR                                 ..... Respondent
                                         Represented by:         Mr.Ashish Sehrawat and Mr.
                                                                 Kapil Yadav, Advocates.

                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
                                HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
                                              ORDER

% 04.05.2022 CM APPL. 19801/2021 (For setting aside the order dated 10.02.2021)

1. Interactions held in the chamber with the parties and the child.

2. The parties confirmed that they have settled for divorce through mutual consent and Rs.8 lakhs have been paid towards the settlement of entire claims for maintenance and permanent alimony past, present and future and that they both would be appearing for making their statement before the Ld. Judge, Family Courts in the divorce petition under Section 13B(2) of The Hindu Marriage Act, for second motion.

3. During the interactions the child expressed her willingness to reside and to continue schooling with her father.

4. The parties had also agreed for a shared parenting plan in regard to the custody of the child. However, subsequently, the wife resiled Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed MAT.APP.(F.C.) 128/2020 Page 1 of 2 By:NIRMLA TIWARI Signing Date:06.05.2022 11:20:09 from the settlement in regard to shared custody of the child.

5. List the appeal on 9th May, 2022 for further consideration.

6. The parties are directed to appear in person on the next date of hearing.

7. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

MAY 04, 2022 va Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed MAT.APP.(F.C.) 128/2020 Page 2 of 2 By:NIRMLA TIWARI Signing Date:06.05.2022 11:20:09