Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Krishna Sarjerao Fande vs The State Of Maharashtra on 25 June, 2020

Author: V.K. Jadhav

Bench: V.K. Jadhav

                                   1                   BA 490.2020.odt

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

               983 BAIL APPLICATION NO.490 OF 2020

                 KRISHNA SARJERAO FANDE
                            VERSUS
               THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                ...
       Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sudarshan J. Salunke
              APP for Respondent : Mr. A M Phule
                                ...
                    CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.
                     Dated : June 25, 2020
                                ...
     PER COURT :-

     1.               The applicant is seeking regular bail in

     connection with Crime No.271 of 2019 registered with

     Majalgaon (Rural) Police Station, District Beed for the

     offences punishable under sections 376, 506 of IPC and

     under section 67-A of the Information Technology Act,

     2000. His application with similar prayer bearing Misc.

     Cri. Appln No.155 of 2020 came to be rejected by the

     learned Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon vide order

     dated 2.6.2020.



     2.               Learned counsel for the applicant submits

     that the applicant is cousin brother-in-law of the victim.



     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 26/06/2020                ::: Downloaded on - 27/06/2020 02:16:44 :::
                                    2                   BA 490.2020.odt

     Victim is a married woman thirty years of age. Though,

     there are allegations about commission of rape, it has

     also been alleged that the applicant has video recorded

     the commission of rape. Learned counsel submits that

     as per the allegations, if victim was subjected to forcible

     intercourse, it is unbelievable that the applicant has

     video recorded the said commission of rape.               Learned

     counsel submits that it is also pertinent that the pen-

     drive of the said video recording has been handed over

     by the informant/victim herself to the police during the

     course of investigation. Learned counsel submits that

     there is no dispute reached to the Court, however, the

     two families are in cross terms.           Learned counsel

     submits that the applicant may be released on bail and

     he is ready to abide the conditions, if imposed by the

     Court not to enter in the village till the conclusion of the

     trial.



     3.               Learned A.P.P. has strongly resisted the

     application on the ground that serious allegations about

     commission of rape have been made against the


     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 26/06/2020                ::: Downloaded on - 27/06/2020 02:16:44 :::
                                     3                    BA 490.2020.odt

     applicant. The applicant has not only committed rape

     but also video recorded the incident.            There is every

     possibility of the tampering with the prosecution

     evidence, if the applicant is released on bail.



     4.               On going through the allegations made in the

     complaint and on perusal of the charge sheet, I fnd it

     pertinent that at the time of commission of rape the

     applicant/accused has video recorded the incident.

     Furthermore, it is also surprising that the victim herself

     has produced the pen-drive of the said video recording

     before the investigating offcer. It is not clear as to in

     what manner she got pen-drive of the said video

     recording.          The applicant and victim are the close

     relatives. The applicant is cousin brother-in-law of the

     victim. Thus, considering the entire aspect of the case

     and the applicant is in jail since 1.3.2020, I am inclined

     to release the applicant on bail with certain conditions.

     The applicant and the victim are residing in the same

     village and it is thus appropriate to impose the condition

     on the applicant as not to enter in the village till the


     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 26/06/2020                  ::: Downloaded on - 27/06/2020 02:16:44 :::
                                       4                        BA 490.2020.odt

     conclusion of the trial to avoid the tampering. Hence,

     following order.

                                   ORDER

I. The application is hereby allowed.

II. The applicant Krishna Sarjerao Fande in connection with Crime No.271 of 2019 registered with Majalgaon (Rural) Police Station, District Beed for the offences punishable under sections 376, 506 of IPC and under section 67-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 be released on bail on furnishing P.B. of Rs.15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen Thousand) with one surety of the like amount, on the following conditions.

a] The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence, in any manner.

b] The applicant shall not enter within the limits of village Sawargaon, Tq. Majalgaon, District Beed till the conclusion of the Trial.

III. Application is accordingly disposed off.

( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ...

aaa/-

::: Uploaded on - 26/06/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 27/06/2020 02:16:44 :::