Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Monit Trading Private Limited vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors on 6 January, 2022

Author: S. M. Modak

Bench: R. D. Dhanuka, S. M. Modak

Chittewan                                                      34-Wp-3024-2021.odt



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                          WRIT PETITION NO.3024 OF 2021

M/s Monit Trading Pvt. Ltd.               ... Petitioner
     Versus
The Union of India
And Others                                ... Respondents


                                   ******
Mr. Rahul C. Thakkar i/b Mr. C.B. Thakkar for the Petitioner.
Ms. P.H. Kantharia, Government Pleader a/w Ms. Jyoti Chavan, AGP for the
State-Respondent.
                                   ******

                                          CORAM : R. D. DHANUKA &
                                                  S. M. MODAK, JJ.
                                          DATE     : 6th JANUARY 2022.
                                          (Through Video Conference)


P.C. :-

.           Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner invited our attention to

various correspondence annexed to the petition and would submit that the application filed by the Petitioner for revocation of cancellation of order dated 20 January 2021 before Respondent No.3 is still pending. The statement is accepted.

2 Respondent No.3 is directed to decide the said application after granting personal hearing to the Petitioner within two weeks from the date of granting personal hearing to the Petitioner.



3           The Petitioner is diretced to remain present before Respondent No.3 on
                                                                                       1/2
                    Chittewan                                                            34-Wp-3024-2021.odt



12 January 2022 at 11.00 a.m. The Petitioner is at liberty to file written arguments and produce documents, if any, in support of its submission. If the date assigned is not convenient to Respondent No.3, the next assigned date shall be communicated to the Petitioner with 48 hours advance notice before the date of hearing. The order that would be passed by Respondent No.3 shall be communicated to the Petitioner within one week from the date of passing of the order.

4 If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the order that would be passed by Respondent No.3, the Petitioner would be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any view on merits of the matter.

5 The contentions of both parties on merit are kept open. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

6 No order as to costs.

7 Ms. Jyoti Chavan, learned AGP agrees to communicate the present order to Respondent No.3 for information and compliance.

8 The Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order.



RAJESH
VASANT
            Digitally signed by
            RAJESH VASANT
            CHITTEWAN
            Date: 2022.01.07
                                  [S. M. MODAK, J.]                           [R. D. DHANUKA, J.]
CHITTEWAN   19:22:14 +0530




                                                                                                              2/2