Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Madras High Court

S.P. Natarajan And Etc. vs Chief Engineer, Highways & Rural Works ... on 12 February, 1999

Equivalent citations: AIR1999MAD458, AIR 1999 MADRAS 458, (2000) 1 ARBILR 149

JUDGMENT

N.K. Jain, Ag. C.J.

1. These two writ appeals have been filed by the appellants against the common order of the learned single Judge dated 14-10-1998 dismissing the Writ Petitions.

2. The grievance of the petitioners is that they are registered class I contractors of Highways and Rural Works Department The pre-qualification conditions prescribed by the respondents for participating in the bid in respect of west coast road tender, viz., widening and strengthening the existing carriage way of west Coast Road to two lane including C.D. works from Kanyakumari District to Pazhaya Utchakadai are intended only to eliminate other contractors and grant the contract to their own party men and it is arbitrary.

3. The learned single Judge on consideration, held that the said pre-qualifications have been introduced only in terms of Government Order in Ms. H.C No. 2086 dated 25-10-1989. Under the said Government order, where there is any work costing more than a crore of rupees, there should be a condition of pre-qualification in respect of contract and only on satisfying those pre-conditions, the contractor would be allowed to take part in the tender proceedings. The learned single Judge has also observed that the petitioners/ appellants have not registered their names in terms of an advertisement in the Indian Express and as such, they are not entitled to be considered to take part in the tender proceedings and as such, it cannot be said to be an arbitrary exercise of power on the part of the Government. The learned single Judge thus dismissed the writ petitions.

4. We have heard and persued the records. We find no error or illegality in the order passed by the learned single Judge, so as to call for interference. The writ appeals arc dismissed. CMP 2270/ 99 is also dismissed.