Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Rajesh @ Sarkari vs The State Of Haryana on 18 August, 2020

Bench: D.Y. Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra, K.M. Joseph

     Crl.A.1648/2019
                                                            1

     ITEM NO.2                                 Court 4 (VC)                          SECTION II-B

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                           I.A. No.70114/2020 in Criminal Appeal No.1648/2019


     RAJESH @ SARKARI & ANR.                                                     Appellant(s)

                                                        VERSUS

     THE STATE OF HARYANA                                                        Respondent(s)

     (With appln.(s) for grant of bail)


     Date : 18-08-2020 These matters were called on for hearing today.


     CORAM :
                                  HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
                                  HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA
                                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH


     For Appellant(s)                    Mr. Rakesh K. Khanna, Sr. Adv.
                                         Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR

     For Respondent(s)                   Mr. Deepak Thukral, AAG
                                         Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR


                                 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                    O R D E R

1 The application for bail which has been filed by the appellants has been listed today. Mr Rakesh Khanna, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants states that the appellants have already undergone twelve years and four months of actual custody and with remission, the period undergone would be sixteen years and six months.

2 Mr Deepak Thukral, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent- State submits that the appellants are on parole at present and the period is Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ARJUN BISHT Date: 2020.08.18 19:22:48 IST Reason: to expire on 10 September 2020.

Crl.A.1648/2019 2

3 We are of the view that it would be appropriate to list the Criminal Appeal for final hearing on 1 September 2020. Hence, the hearing of the application for bail is deferred at this stage.

4 The Registry shall list the Criminal Appeal for final hearing at the end of the miscellaneous board on 1 September 2020.

      (CHETAN KUMAR)                                             (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)
        AR-cum-PS                                                   BRANCH OFFICER